جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « مشکل الحدیث » در نشریات گروه « علوم قرآن و حدیث »

The collection of hadiths concerning “ Abyssal Thinking “ which includes the Qudsi hadith: “ترددی فی موت عبدی المومنک ء انا فاعله ما ترددت فی شی”, can be considered as one of the clear examples of the problematic hadith (مشکل الحدیث) that has been discussed for centuries by scholars, jurists, theologians, philosophers, Shia and Sunni mystics and commentators. The following article seeks to analyze the validation of the hadith collection of “ Abyssal Thinking “ based on the ancient “book-oriented” validation system. The purpose of implementing this process is not only to find out the validity of this collection of hadiths, but also to trace the entry of these hadiths into the first Shia hadith sources and its flow in later sources. Collecting the primary sources containing this hadith can present the belief hidden in it as an accepted and comprehensive thought among the Imamiyyah. Therefore, in order to achieve these two important things, i.e.: identifying the first narrators and also discovering the first hadith books containing the hadith, by analyzing the documents of this valuable and famous hadith in the existing hadith sources, we traced it in the primary hadith sources and as a result, proved its validity and strength.

"Jihad of explanation" has become one of the most frequent words in the works of analysts of the orders of the Supreme Leader, who in the Arbaʿīn of 1400, in a meeting with students, listed "jihad of explanation" as one of their duties. In this context, examining the religious foundations of this work is of great value; because it gives it a double religious effect. The Jihad of explanation is very important and necessary to remove objections and problems from the field of Islamic knowledge, especially Hadiths and to protect the religion from the enmity of opponents. With this approach, the present research seeks to answer the question of how Imam Riḍā (as) explained the "problem of hadith" of his ancestors and with the help of what approach and method? The following article, while expressing the religious basis of the keyword "Jihad of explanation", has examined the lifestyle of Imam Riḍā (as) within the scope of the book ʾUyun Akhbār al-Riḍā (as). According to the findings of the research, which is based on the documentary method; facing the problem of hadith, Imam Riḍā (as) tried to explain the hadith problem of his ancestors which had caused doubts and questions in the Islamic society with three approaches: "explanation", "denial" and "esoteric interpretation".  The main goal of this research is to show that the Jihad of explanation is a holy matter, that the main strivers of this Jihad are the purified infallible Imams (as); therefore, it is necessary for the Shia community, especially the educated scholars with following the example of the pure Imams (as), strive to explain Islamic teachings and truths, and even to explain the important social and political issues of the society.

Analysing the meaning of the narrations about the believer salvation, including sinner and righteous, is one of the complicated topics in theology regarding the belief in monotheism and the avoidance of polytheism. Citing the apparent meaning of these narrations, regardless of these themes: ‘Is the salvation of the monotheist with deeds auditing?’ or ‘Is salvation without auditing the purpose of narrations?’ has consequences such as being from the paradise of the sinful believer without questioning, conflict with the narrations about the conformity of the Hereafter punishment with worldly act, etc. With a descriptive-analytical method, the present study aimed to express semantic aspects and conflict resolution alternatives of these narrations by analysing documents, paying attention to the issuance and written origin of narrations, validating sources and analysing the hadith explanation approaches of the two sect scholars. The results indicated that we had reached the techniques from “Absolute Acceptance” to “Absolute Denial” of hadiths, often organised with divine justice to adapt and harmonise. Restricting the meaning of words and interpreting the apparent meaning on issues such as not doing disruptive and denying acts of faith, the believer succeeding in repenting of sin, not going to hell, etc., are the solutions of the scholars to the understanding profound meaning of Imams.

Certain hadiths have a controversial content which is hardly understood. They are categorized as mushkil al-hadīth (hadith containing difficult words or meanings) and the attempt to understand them in a correct way is associated with different approaches. One of these hadiths is the one denoting that in the eyes of the Children of Israel (Banī Isrā'īl) the flesh, skin or clothes when contaminated with urine should be cut off. This tradition has been mentioned in Shi'a and Sunni hadith collections with different words but with almost the same concept. The opinions about this hadith can be classified in the three major groups of acceptance, rejection and suspension of decision (tawaqquf). Having quoted and criticized these opinions the present study is inclined to attribute the concept of this hadith as a metaphorical meaning denoting the exaggeration of the hardship of purification among the Children of Israel.

One of the complicated traditions in the field of God's unicity is the response of the InfallibleImams to the question whether or not the world can be inserted into an egg with no change in thevolume of either of them. It is followed by two basic problems: first,to consider an intellectuallyimpossible issue by the analogy of insertion of the image of things in the eye,which is notcongruous with the mere question,second,the contradiction,duality when responding the samequestion. Having applied a descriptive-deductive method,the present article has analyzed thesehadiths,has found out that the scholars accept merely the apparent denotation of certaintraditions,have deemed this issue impossible. They either interpret or deny the traditions thathave solved the problem by the metaphorical allegory of insertion of the world in the eye. On thecontrary,they have no comments when facing the traditions that denote the feasibility of this issueby means of making changes in the two sides (i.e. eye,world). Today by means of the theoriesof "holography","removal of the free space of an atom" in physics a new version of thesetraditions can be presented,so that the improbable denotation of these traditions can be manifestedas possible,this version can be considered as a solution to remove this contradiction.

The lack of faith attributed to women in the eightieth sermon of Nahj al-Balagheh, seems to indicate the lack of talent of women in achieving perfection. Especially since their lack of faith has been documented in abstaining from prayer during menstruation. Since the most important perfection in religious thought is approaching God and attaining complete faith, the lack of faith of women will mean the denial of equality between men and women in value, and the text indicates the lack of ability of women to reach the truth of faith. Therefore, it is very important to study this question, what is the meaning of this narration? What does faith mean and what is the role of fulfilling the obligations in faith? This research has This research has commented on this narration in a descriptive-analytical method based on the hypothesis of issuing a narration, paying attention to its appearance and paying attention to other verses and narrations stating that there is no difference between men and women in accepting worships. Women suffer from a lack of faith due to abstaining from prayer and fasting on some days. On the other hand, it is possible for women to compensate for this defect. Therefore, it does not conflict with the Qur'an or other narrations.

Knowledge is one of the perfection attributes of God, and it has no restrictions. The Quran states that Allah knowledge surrounds all things completely, and it repeatedly emphasize that God has knowledge of everything. Sheikh Saduq narrated a tradition from Imam Sadiq (PBUH), as follow: " من قال یعلم الله لما لا یعلم الله اهتز العرش إعظاما لله عز و جل "; everyone says about what God knows, He knows, shook the throne of God falls into the bow of God. The appearance of this tradition is the conflict with the definitive teachings of Islam, because here, this is about the unknowingly by God. One question arises for the audience is that if there is something that the Creator is unaware of it? This article tries for the first time, with studying the different resources, provide an answer to this question. In this regard, the origin version of this tradition will be examine, and explore the evidences and content of tradition. Following discussion applies to the Tashif, Rejal, problem with Hadith and Fiqh al-Hadith.

Removingthedoubts of the teachings of religion is inevitable. Resolving the doubts concerning religious teachings is an inevitable responsibility. Hadithas a source for religious deduction is no exception to this serious rule In response to these doubts, two approach can be followed: the one considering all the probabilities, even the most unacceptable ones(esbati) and the one seeking a real response (sobuti).Allameh Shobbar, is one of the scholars who have benefited from both approaches in resolving the complications related to Hadiths. This issue is the concern of this study.