جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "marx" در نشریات گروه "فلسفه و کلام"

This article has attempted descriptively to analyze, explain, and criticize the Marxist’s point of view about the priority of professions over thoughts, which results from the priority of the institution and the material and economic interests of the society over other social institutions. The major question is whether, as so-called scientific Marxism claims, the social class in general and the economy and living conditions, in particular, are the only or at least the most fundamental factors in individual and social changes. Or, as Max Weber sets forth, thought and faith are fundamental, and ideal and spiritual thoughts give meaning to real and practical interests and justify them. However, the victory of thoughts is possible if they have a relationship with real and practical interests. Interests and professions have a reciprocal relationship with thoughts, and none of them can survive without the other. Professor Motahari also proposes the integrated theory of Islam, according to which Karl Marx's opinion is naive and immature, but Max Weber's opinion is rational and mature.

In this paper, the central issue that is followed is the discussion of freedom and its realization from the perspective of Marx. While the central issue in modernity is the realization of human freedom, this meaning of freedom has changed and changed throughout history. However, one can argue that the central criteria for human freedom in modernity is a kind of self-determination that this criterion has been affected by various changes. The presence of the grand praxis is the ultimate outcome of freedom and history from the perspective of Marx, and history is nothing but the work of man creation, but its rising face is nothing more than society, and in this sense it is possible to emerge as a social reappearance and only a social aspect.