جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « رساله قشیریه » در نشریات گروه « ادیان و عرفان »

Similarities and Disparities between Morality and Mysticism in Aḥyā-yi ʿUlūm and Rasālah-yi QushayrīyyahAbstract Abd al-Karīm Qushayrī’s Rasālah-yi Qushayrīyyah and Muḥammad Ghazzālī’s Aḥyā-yi ʿUlūm are two prominent works in mysticism and ethics. Rasālah-yi Qushayrīyyah is considered a major work in mysticism, while Aḥyā-yi ʿUlūm al-Dīn is renowned for its exploration of ethics. The authors present their perspectives on mysticism and ethics, analyzing various topics and offering definitions of ethical vices and virtues. This research employs an analogical-descriptive approach to examine concepts such as ego, good behavior, jealousy, repentance, happiness (riḍā), and patience in order to identify similarities and disparities between these two fields of mysticism and ethics. The findings indicate that while both works aim to cultivate the human ego, preventing vices and promoting virtues, they differ in their ultimate goals, solutions, principles, and approaches in addressing these issues and resolving subjects such as human ego and obedience to their leader (pīshwā). Keywords: Ethics, Mysticism, Ethical virtues, Aḥyā-yi ʿUlūm al-Dīn, Rasālah-yi QushayrīyyahSimilarities and Disparities between Morality and Mysticism in Aḥyā-yi ʿUlūm and Rasālah-yi QushayrīyyahAbstract Abd al-Karīm Qushayrī’s Rasālah-yi Qushayrīyyah and Muḥammad Ghazzālī’s Aḥyā-yi ʿUlūm are two prominent works in mysticism and ethics. Rasālah-yi Qushayrīyyah is considered a major work in mysticism, while Aḥyā-yi ʿUlūm al-Dīn is renowned for its exploration of ethics. The authors present their perspectives on mysticism and ethics, analyzing various topics and offering definitions of ethical vices and virtues. This research employs an analogical-descriptive approach to examine concepts such as ego, good behavior, jealousy, repentance, happiness (riḍā), and patience in order to identify similarities and disparities between these two fields of mysticism and ethics. The findings indicate that while both works aim to cultivate the human ego, preventing vices and promoting virtues, they differ in their ultimate goals, solutions,

By focusing on the emotional side of the theory of care, one can reread texts from ancient works and recognize similarities in the direction of restoring moral relationships. This recognition can be expanded, especially by referring to the mystical tradition of Iran and documenting its reference texts. The present article interprets the theme of justice in close connection with "ethical care of self and others" considering the Treatise of Qushayri (Risala Qushayriyya). After establishing the position of care-oriented justice in Qashiri's text, attention is paid to its moral-normative efficiency for today's world. This critical review, which continued the initial discussion of the research in a descriptive and analytical way, was organized by referring to Descartes' provisional ethics; Because this philosopher's reading of ethics lays the groundwork for coexistence in a state of intellectual conflict. Acknowledging that Descartes' manner provides an up-to-date condition for moral care connected to justice, the capacity of Qashyri's mystical approach to fulfill a similar purpose can be recognized.

Muslim Mystics were always seeking for a new understanding of the Qurān and religious concepts in order to achieve the truth. They are certainly benefiting from the assumptions such as the meaning of the Qurānic verses for discovering significance. One of the proposed Qurānic concepts among the mystics، especially in mystics of the third and fourth centuries، was the mystical term “Tawakkol”. This term was paraphrased by different mystics with variety of thought and contemplation. Tawakkol، with its broad concepts، is very important doctrines among the mystics. This study examines the transformation of the Qurānic concept of Tawakkol and making of new concepts in the literature of the Sufis، with an emphasis on Resāleh Qoshayrieh is founded and research hypothesis based on that Sufis according to historical and cultural position. Their different scenarios and authorities، had a different take on the concept of Tawakkol; is tested through research method according to Gadamer''s epistemology and traditionalist hermeneutics in order that the nature of the difference of mystics'' perceptions and their prejudices، from interpretation of Qurānic verses about Tawakkol، is explained and recognized. Examination of these attitudes، can be effective to understand the reasons of disagreement Sufis for the definition of a term and the diversity of their perceptions.

The purpose of total mystics and devotees out of sufferings and difficulties is to achieve divine realities and proximity, the realization of which is not possible except through intuition and introspection. Mysticism and Sufism as a branch of human knowledge is a proper haven for expressing mystic's thoughts and beliefs and causes the emergence of mystical definitions and expressions. The mental, religious, ideological, cultural, and mystical backgrounds of Sufis have been effective in origination of such mysterious words. Those words and expressions used in the talks of Sufis represent their moods and positions, and though sometimes it seems that their talks are different from one another and expressed in a variety of ways, they have had the same purpose to convey.This paper studies the word "manifestation" and its different types according to the attitudes of some Sufis. Manifestation is one of those expressions that mystics use to indicate the quality of their vision and whatever they receive from the Almighty and His presence in the objective world, and have endeavored to pave the way to get close to God by perceiving their link to the Almighty. Since spiritual journey is something individual and empirical, demonstrating mystic's intakes and perceptions has been achieved in various and similar ways.