Examining the (general and specific) evidence obliging the government to compensate in the event of a devaluation

Adoption of some political or economic procedures of the government sometimes causes the devaluation of money and consequently inflation, and therefore different groups of society due to this wrong and ill-considered behavior of the government, also due to devaluation of financial assets and purchasing power, suffer great losses. They returned. What has been seriously debated and debated is the government's responsibility to compensate for the loss of value of money. Which should be considered by researchers.

This research has been organized using content analysis method and library (documentary) study.

Ethical considerations:

 In all stages of writing the present study, while respecting the originality of the texts, honesty and trustworthiness have been observed.

indicate that the government by actions such as printing banknotes without accurate or unsupported expertise or by creating political disputes and inciting political strife and incitement. , Causes economic problems and consequently devaluation of money and damage to people, is a guarantor and must compensate for the damage. Government guarantee and liability for damages arising from harmful actions and decisions [in addition to using the principles and arguments governing the guarantee of natural persons and extending it to the state guarantee to compensate for damages resulting from the devaluation of money] according to rules such as the rule of justice, rule of law Muslim, the maintenance of economic security and public order has been proven as general evidence and rules such as waste, harmlessness and proportion in the number of specific evidences.

Examination of the opinions of great jurists and criticism of the arguments presented in the impermissibility of retaliation for the devaluation of money and the necessary attention to the narrated arguments and jurisprudential rules show that the responsibility of the ruling system and the principle of the need to compensate the damages caused by the ruling system It has also been declared necessary