The rationale for conducting this study was based on an interdisciplinary approach between art and curriculum. The main purpose was to examine Iranian and Canadian primary arts education curricula based on these four components: goals, content, teaching methods and evaluation methods. The research method was comparative, using Bereday’s four-step approach. The sample selection method was based on the strategy of “different systems, different results”. Data were collected using documents, available information in official government databases, books, and publications, that were analyzed based on John Stuart Mill’s agreement/difference method. The findings revealed significant similarities and differences between the primary schools’ arts education curricula in Iran and Canada. The similarities were found to be based on the goals and the differences mainly in the content of curriculum. Regarding the goals, although both countries have used their national cultural backgrounds in formulating the goals, Canada also has considered the native and folk culture in development of the curriculum. Furthermore, in Canada, the emphasis is on awareness of inner emotions as a prerequisite for the production of art. In the element of content, dance and music education is not included in the Iranian arts education curriculum, and in Canada, the storytelling falls under the category of drama. As to the teaching methods, getting artists to teach art is not conventional in Iran’s education, but in Canada, artists teach art alongside teachers.Moreover, the purpose of arts education evaluation in Canada is to "improve learning", while in Iran, the measure of "learning ability" is generally considered.

Money laundering as a complex and long-term process is related to the processing of proceeds of criminal activities to conceal or change the appearance of the illegal source of money, and involves the three stages of stratification, Chinese stratification and integration. And Canada has envisioned measures to prevent and combat money laundering.The present study, in a descriptive and analytical method, compared the crime of money laundering in the legal system of Iran and Canada, and the responses of the legal system of Iran and Canada to it, comparing the situation of money laundering in the two countries, which showed that despite the two countries Money laundering is one of the most important economic crimes in the two countries due to the weakness of government oversight.And in Iran, it can be considered as a disruption of the economic system and corruption on earth. Among the differences between money laundering in the two countries are the following: More recent commitments in the fight against money laundering in Canadian law that have not been met in Iranian law - the primary goals of developing anti-money laundering legal systems in Canada's two legal systems And the Islamic Republic of Iran is different - International intelligence cooperation in the fight against money laundering is seen as a key distinguishing feature between the Iranian and Canadian legal systems in the fight against money laundering.

In October 2019, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice decided the seizure of Iran’s bank accounts and the sale of Iran’s property in Canadian territory to execute the US Court judgments in the so-called terrorism cases. Canada has violated Iran’s jurisdictional immunity by enacting Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act (2012), and violated Iran’s enforcement/(or) executive immunity by executing US Court judgments, and has thus engaged Canada’s international responsibility. Iran can institute proceedings against Canada in the International Court of Justice by issuing a declaration of the acceptance of the Court’s compulsory jurisdiction, and it does not appear to be difficult to prove the wrongfulness of Canada’s action in the merits, given the ICJ Judgment in the Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (2012). In addition to the possibility of US entry to the (or) US intervention in the case as a third party and raising multiple claims, and the possibility of  a counterclaim, there will also be threats to Iran due to the declaration of the acceptance of the Court’s compulsory jurisdiction and it is likely to trigger some claims against Iran within the scope of that declaration.

One of the topics that attracts attention during the seventy-year history of establishing official relations between Iran and Canada (since 1956/1335) is the role of the book and its related issues in the relations between the two countries. According to the available documents, sending books from Iran to Canada by the government institutions and writing books about Iran (in Canada) with the cooperation and support of the Iranian government are the most important symbols of the connection between the two countries.  In this article, the role of the book in the framework of the official relations of the two countries from 1339 to 1357, has been investigated by using a descriptive-analytical method and relying on archival documents. The findings show that in this relatively short period, attention to the book on the political-cultural relations of the two countries has had significant importance and an expanding trend. In these publications, the history and culture of Iran have been written and published, and familiarity with Iran and the Persian language has expanded in Canada.