جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « discourse analysis » در نشریات گروه « علوم انسانی »

The aim of the current research is to analyze the discourse of tourism development with a justice-oriented and moderate approach. The present research method was discourse analysis and applicable in terms of purpose. The statistical sample in this research was a total of 60 texts, including all texts expressed by government managers in the tourism sector in two historical periods of governance in the Islamic Republic of Iran, with justice-oriented discourse and moderation discourse in 8-year periods. The library method was also used to collect data. The findings showed that the characteristics of traditional public administration included: applying the authority of the government over all departments, intense hierarchical structures, integrity of regulations and working procedures, separation of administration from politics, and strict controls. Also, the characteristics of modern public administration included: deregulation, privatization, adjustment of manpower, and market competition. Justice-oriented discourse management is close to modern public administration and includes features of good governance. Also, moderation discourse management is closer to modern public administration and includes features of traditional public administration.

current research is to critically analyze the discourse of world peace in the textbooks of the Iranian educational system based on the theory of identification by L& M. For this purpose, the textbooks between the years 1357-1392 (primary period and first period high school) have been analyzed. This article has been done with the combined method of analyzing the discourse of Fairclough, L &M and focusing on the following questions: What was the status of the world peace discourse in the educational documents of this era? What subjects are these educational materials trying to create? What role have the dominant political discourses in this era played in shaping the identity of these subjects? The findings show that the discourse of world peace in educational books and documents has been rejected due to the demarcation between Islamic and non-Islamic, internal and external. Power processes have tried to create militant and vengeful subjects with a military identity. The factor of persuasion of the subjects is the axiomatization of the ideologies of the revolution with an Islamic nature. Also, the educational content by inducing specific defense ideologies has formed pacifist identities in all individual, interpersonal, social and international dimensions.

Mirza Ali Khan Zahir al-Doulah, with the support of his political position in the Qajar court and his belief base in the Safi Alishahi Tariqat, and by creating intellectual and freedom-loving organizations, is considered one of the influential figures in the course of constitutionalism. The current research, using Farklaf's discourse analysis approach, seeks to answer the following questions: How is the discourse order of Qajar era Iran reproduced in Zahir al-Doulah's poems? Discourse actions of his poems reflect which of the social actions? And what is Zahir al-Doulah's solution to get out of the ruling discourses? The results showed that the social structure of the Qajar period was reflected in the discourse functions of Zahir al-Dawlah by choosing names based on expressive values, and the participants were categorized into two groups: 1- "Positive" group including God, religious and mystic elders, and positive personalities; 2- "Negative" group including oppressive rulers, tyrannical powerful, ignorant and oppressive classes of society. Zahir al-Douleh, by empathizing with the people, from the position of a critic, has created a discourse confrontation and believes that the way to get rid of the ruling discourse is everyone's movement towards anti-oppression and awareness.

"Apostrophe" (Iltifāt) means grammatical altering between the use of first, second, and third person in a sentence or consecutive sentences. It aims at examining the coherence in the Holy Quran. Speech act theory is one of the important topics in pragmatics. It conveys that a conversation includes many acts such as description, declaration, command, prohibition, prayer, wish, etc. Considering a text as an act enables religious texts experts to change the nature of the texts more systematically. John Searle is one of the theorists of this area. He has classified speech acts into representatives, directives, commissives, expressive, and declarations. In this study, based on his theory, as a linguistic discourse analysis, and by using a descriptive-analytical method, the text and context of Iltifāt verses in the Holy Quran have been examined, and the type of their acts were identified. According to the results, regarding Searle's five speech acts, in these verses, the representative and commissive acts have been used more and less than other types, respectively. Also, the verbs used in each of these speech acts are as follows: describing, emphasizing, reporting, criticizing, and granting in the representative act, offering, making a condition, asking for explanation, protestingly asking, etc. in the directive act, giving and making a pledge, and swearing in the commissive act, praising, thanking, threatening, wishing, etc. in the expressive act, and terminating and judging in the declaration act.

Zinde Bagor Sadegh Hedayat is one of the realist stories in which the narrator not only portrays himself but also others as black and ugly. The narrator then justifies his negative characteristics through the social and psychological context and in this way uses psychological defense mechanisms. has been introduced and the narrator has portrayed the main character as hateful and ugly in order to show his anger towards the existing situation at the same time as representing social realities.In this research, the authors will examine and analyze the two stories of Zinda Bagor and Haji Murad with a descriptive-analytical method and relying on Van Dyck's ideological square theory. Among the results of this research in the story of Zind Begour is the narrator's discriminating view of the foreign culture and finding out the personality disorders of the people in the story, as well as confronting the hypocrisy and patriarchal society among the achievements of this research in the story of Haji Murad river.

The purpose of this paper is "Discourse Analysis of Cultural and Political Messages of Tehran Municipality" based on Laclau and Mouffe's discourse theory, published on the billboards of Tehran from 2006 to 2016, in order to answer these questions: How the Tehran municipality articulates discourse due to its nodal points and floating signifiers? Has it considered antagonizing and rejection of rival discourse components? The researcher achieved a theoretical saturation by the targeted selection of 25 graphic designs and exploring the semantic implications and discourse structure of each according to the concepts and components of discourse theory. The findings of the research show: The nodal point and the “guardianship-centeredness (velayatmadari) “is on the focus of the municipality, the “jihadi management”, “clericalism”, “cultural invasion” are articulated around this focal point which has conformity with the discourse of “principals”. The chain of equivalence with the critical political and social activists of the government was not formed.

Because of their importance in the economic and social development of societies, science and technology policies have become one of the most important arenas of discourse conflict. Therefore, the present study was conducted with the aim of analyzing the discourse of the sixth program based on Laclau and Mouffe's approach. The studied society was all the legal articles and notes related to science and technology in the law of the sixth development plan, which were studied in full. The findings show that the central signifier of this document is "purposeful scientific innovation". It has built its symbols based on three signs: "Efficiency and modernity, privatization/popularization and knowledge-based economy". The floating sign has shown itself in the form of "collaboration and scientific participation" and "competitive performance". The null signs are "Employment", "Scientific modernization and improvement" and "Scientific productivity" which are associated with interruptions and moments of "People building", "Educational modernization and improvement" and "Islamic culture and values". The discourse area of this program is "state-centered, external dependence, reduction of deprivation and scientific neutrality" which "culture-centered/landscape-centered" discourse with its hegemonic position has marginalized conflicts and consolidated the space for its own discourse maneuver. The results of this study show that this program is moving towards quantitative goals with an emphasis on positivist and supply-oriented processes, which has made it possible to popularize science and use social capital with a serious vacuum.

In this sense, identity and the emergence of crisis have been one of the most important social and political concepts after modernity in sociological studies. This concept was considered as an element of social life after the industrial revolution and changes in the social life of modern humans. Cities, as the platform of social life, which have provided a distinct and new life for today's humans, have been influential in different aspects of the fluidization of identity. Therefore, the main question of the current research is: How does the fluidization of human identity occur in the context of the new city? The main hypothesis of the current research is: "The increase in the role of the new city in the identification of today's people has reduced the coherence and integrity of the identity, which leads to the fluidity of multiple identities". In this research, the ideas of the French thinker Henri Lefebvre about the city and space were chosen as a theoretical framework, and the data analysis method is the discourse analysis method of Laclau and Mouffe. The documentary method has also been used in the data collection method.

The analysis of the riots in the fall of 1401 in the Islamic Republic, which was designed by the enemies of the Islamic Revolution in the interpretation of the Supreme Leader of the revolution, can be done from different angles. The purpose of this research is to identify and explain different discourses to analyze these disturbances. For this purpose, the discourse analysis method of Lacla and Moff has been used as a qualitative research method. Data collection has been done using a semi-structured and in-depth interview with 19 professors of the Islamic Revolution who gathered in the meeting of the Scientific Association of the Islamic Revolution in Shiraz in February 1401, during 30 hours of interviews and about 400 pages of notes. After coding the interviews; The findings of the research show that the analysis of the riots of the fall of 1401 is included in four discourses that are complementary to each other: first, the "political-security discourse" around the nodal point of the "civilizational confrontation between Islam and the West"; Second, the "discourse of the governance system" around the nodal point of "governance malfunctions"; Third, "educational discourse" around the nodal point of "weakness of divine approach in formal and informal education system"; And fourth, "social discourse" revolves around the nodal point of "spreading the western lifestyle". Deep attention to these results by policy makers and governance decision makers can be helpful in reducing the damage of these disturbances and preventing similar disturbances to some extent.

In an overview, eight discourses and currents can be identified across European and American Iranian studies foundations and centers: archaeological-historical, encyclopedia-writing, Linguistics and Persian literature, cultural-artistic, Iranian scientific and academic studies, social, political, and Islamist-philosophical. Each of these discourses and currents is divided into different schools, sub-discourses, and sub-currents and represented by some foundations and centers. This interdisciplinary article aims to represent and analyze the semiotic system, articulation system, and the identity logic of the discursive environment in prominent western Iranian studies foundations and centers. The focal question is investigating and identifying the concepts and signs that articulate and represent the identity logic of the Western Iranian studies foundations and centers. The focus is on the identity articulation in the system and the discursive logic. The research methodology is based on Essex school’s Semiology (Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe), and corpus-based method. Therefore, first, the output of the centers and foundations, which has an identity-based nature, is extracted through a significant corpus framework; then, their chain of signifiers, signified, and referents is analyzed. Finally, the identity logic is explained by positive in-group and negative out-group representation framework. According to the findings, most of the foundations and centers have a confrontational stance towards the Islamic Revolution and the Islamic Republic. This other-making is associated with foregrounding ancient Iran and Western democracy in the identity logic, metaphorical environment, and articulation system and varies in a spectrum from agonism to antagonism. The Islamic republic, generally, is not in the foundations and institutions’ chain and logic of equivalence, but rather in their chain and logic of difference.

Fereidon Tavallalli was one of the early enthusiasts of Nima Yooshij's innovations in Persian poetry. Tavallali was known as a semi-traditional Romantic poet in contemporary Persian poetry. In addition to his continuous political and social activities, he, as a poet and critic, sought to elaborate and explain his preferred type of poetry. Moreover, some of his poetry collections were accompanied by his introductions and notes. Tavallali's extended introduction to his Raha poetry collection was kind of the Romantic poets’ manifesto in which he acknowledged and defended new poetry and criticized old-fashioned poets and literary associations of that period. In his Raha collection, one can observe political and social poems besides the romantic verses. In the same collection, the poem: Fardaye Enghelab (The Tomorrow of Revolution) is the most famous. The present study's main goal is to examine Fardaye Enghelab according to the ideological square method and analyze the measures taken by the Tudeh-Party-affiliated poet to advance his party goals. The findings of the current study indicated that the poet mostly focused on reinforcing his strength and undermining others’ strong points. Also, he paid scant attention to his weak points and those of others. Moreover, according to this study’s findings, one can extend the four sides of the ideological square method by adding another two sides, that is, the political and social behavior of the poet in describing self and non-self forces under the six sides, thereby improving the ideological square method.

This qualitative research aimed to compare the factors influencing hope discourse across different levels of Sharing. Employing a qualitative approach and discourse analysis, the study involved 16 mothers with children. Participants were selected using purposive sampling and in-depth interviews were conducted. Data was collected, transcribed, coded, and organized into primary categories. Subsequently, the data was analyzed using psychological discourse coding techniques. The analysis identified 34 primary themes and 70 subthemes within the hope discourse of the target population. These themes were categorized into six narrative, cognitive, emotional, behavioral, relational, and temporal dimensions. The findings revealed a positive correlation between Sharing level and belief in attitudinal aspects of Sharing, as well as greater agency in functional and relational aspects. Participants with lower Sharing levels exhibited narratives of hardship, negative self-talk, negative and hindering experiences during crises, negative cognitive perceptions, superficial thinking, dissatisfaction with life, reduced sense of duty and transformation, and weaker communication skills. These findings suggest that an individual's Sharing level significantly influences the dimensions of their hope discourse.

Critical discourse analysis is a systematic theory developed by Norman Fairclough that is highly effective for analyzing works closely linked with the social and political conditions of society. This type of analysis is also crucial for accurately portraying what is happening in society. The theory investigates the work on three levels: description, interpretation, and explanation. In the first level, the theory examines the vocabulary used in the work, while in the interpretation level, it focuses on the discourse conduct and effects of common or hegemonic discourses. In the explanation level, the theory reflects on social behaviors and how social issues are represented in the work. Shahad al-Rawi, a young and novice Iraqi author, wrote two significant works in the second decade of the 21st century. His primary work, "The Baghdad Clock," received praise from critics and readers alike. This study utilizes descriptive-analytical methods to connect the novel with present-day social and political issues in Iraq, particularly focusing on war and occupation stories from past decades. The study aims to provide a critical discourse analysis of the novel to explore how social conditions and socially-produced discourses influence agency. The paper seeks to investigate how war and occupation are portrayed in relation to emigration as a perceived opportunity for educated Iraqi citizens despite their love for their homeland. Exploring discourses within a work is socially and literally critical, thus this paper delves into analyzing "The Baghdad Clock." Findings suggest that the author incorporates formal elements reflecting social conditions impacted by war, occupation, embargoes, etc. Additionally, the study aims to elucidate and normalize emigration discourse as a preferred narrative shaped by societal agents.

Discourse analysis allows for a new and comprehensive understanding of the text by analyzing multiple aspects of the text, and the relationships of language with social-intellectual structures are also identified. The current study uses the descriptive-analytical approach and the American school of comparative literature to examine and analyses the discourse systems of two well-known patriotic poets in Arabic and Persian literature. Two contemporary poets from the Arab and Iranian nations, Aref Qazvini (1882-1933) and Ali Mahmoud Taha (1901-1949) respectively, have a distinct role in expressing and projecting national sentiments and issues relating to the homeland. The primary question of the study is how successful discourse analysis is in Ali Mahmoud Taha's and Aref Qazvini's poetry. The results of the study demonstrate that certain words and sentences are employed in both writers' poems to emphasize the national identity, all of which are consistent with highlighting patriotism, long for the country, and national pride. This outcome demonstrates the intellectual affinity between the two poets and their shared perspective on the usefulness of patriotism as a strategy for resistance and standing.

In recent years, the large-scale Arbaeen Walking Ceremony with the presence of tens of millions of people from different countries and nationalities has attracted the attention of analysts and researchers, and researchers have studied it from the perspective of religious, sociological, anthropological, political and strategic studies. In this research, the discourse model of "Ernest Laclau " and "Chantal Mouffe" has been used to study Arbaeen Walking. The main question of the article is, what are the discourse markers of the Arbaeen walk in individual and collective dimensions? According to the results of this research, in the Arbaeen Walk, keeping alive the memory of Imam Hussain (a.s.) and the martyrs of Karbala is a central sign that can lead to the articulation of other signs by attracting floating signs and in individual and collective dimensions. Also, the Arbaeen Walk has the capacity to marginalize other discourses such as Secularism and Takfirism based on hegemony and discourse competition. The current research was conducted with a qualitative approach and discourse analysis method.

The current research was conducted with the aim of analyzing the indicators of the smart city governance model based on urban justice with the approach of electronic participation. The participants of this research were municipal managers and urban planners with a teaching experience of at least 15 years and a master's degree or higher. The selection of people was done by purposive sampling with the criterion of teaching experience in the elementary education period. Sampling was done with the participation of 18 experts. The data collection tool consisted of two parts, 1- examination and exploration of upstream documents, urban planning documents in the library section, 2- semi-structured interview in the field section, where the semi-structured interview with the participants continued until the theoretical saturation stage. To analyze the qualitative data, the theme analysis method based on the Atreide-Sterling model was used. In order to ensure validity, the interview questions were approved by 3 experienced urban planning and management experts, 1 of whom had a master's degree and 2 had a doctorate. And in order to measure reliability, Krippendorf's alpha coefficient was used, which was confirmed. ATLASTI software is used in the theme analysis. The results of the factor analysis show that among the 176 indicators (items) available, 33 basic themes can be identified and 9 categories of constructive themes have been obtained. The 9 first-level themes identified are: smart governance, smart interaction, smart sustainability, public and private sector cooperation, knowledge integration, smart innovation support, smart infrastructure, smart

The present study was conducted to identify and analyze the dominant discourse on women's championship sports in the country and to identify effective deterrents and reinforcing factors on women's championship sports.

The research method based on the nature of the data and analysis method based on discourse analysis is qualitative and based on the purpose is applied research. The statistical population of this study includes 42 women champions who were included in the list of people sent to the 2012 and 2016 World Olympic and Paralympic Games. Also, theoretical sampling was used, which according to Holloway and Amy, 4 to 40 people are sufficient for qualitative studies.

Findings of discourse analysis show various factors affecting the development of women's championship sports. These factors are classified into two main categories; deterrents and reinforcing factors. Deterrents include: lack of material and moral support of government officials, gender discrimination, lack of club facilities, infrastructure restrictions, patriarchal culture, lack of rewards; and reinforcing factors include: self-confidence, family support, perseverance, high motivation, coach support, teamwork, professional ethics, attention to religious values and women's sports culture.

In this article, Deterrents and Reinforcing factors of women's championship sports identified base on discourse analysis and classified, Solutions for the comprehensive development and improvement of women's championship sports for successful participation in the Olympic and Paralympic competitions have been presented.

One of the theories proposed in the field of applied language science, which is used in discourse analysis and can provide grounds for further understanding of the meaning and interpretation of texts, is the speech act theory. This theory was developed for the first time by Austin and then with the help of his student Searle according to the teachings he learned from linguists. Searle divided speech acts into 5 groups: assertive, directive, commissive, expressive, and declarative, and explained the characteristics of each of these acts. Quranic stories are one of the rich sources of linguistic studies, and by analyzing their linguistic structures and textual contexts, it is possible to examine various types of speech acts. This research tries to analyze the speech act in the field of linguistics using the descriptive method and content analysis, and then, considering the context of the speech, to analyze the types of Searle's classification of speech acts in the verses of Noah's story. Among the important functions of these acts is the detailed explanation of linguistic forms in order to discover the implicit meanings of religious propositions. The findings of the research show that the dominant context of the verses of the story is the type of assertive and expressive acts, these acts mostly seek to express the call to obey God and the divine prophets (peace be upon them), introduce God, describe the world of creation, and the description of Noah's views and states. expression of situations is type (A). One of the implicit meanings of the declaration act is the announcement of the beginning of the mission of Noah (pbuh) and the end of his mission with divine force and the announcement of disbelief in God on the part of unrighteous generations. And one of the indirect meanings of directive act is asking for destruction for the unbelievers.