جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « ترکیه » در نشریات گروه « تاریخ »

The massacre of 150,000 Qashqai’s during the occupation of Iran by the Allies would have erased the Qashqai clan from the scene of the times and put the Qashqai name on the pages of history. Time was passing quickly; military planes were full of explosives and the armed forces under the command of Marshal Jahanbani were ready to encircle the Qashqai’s. A moment of delay was enough to change the fate of one of the Turkish clans. To prevent the massacre, Jamal Hassanu Tarai suggested to the British ambassador in Tehran that we can settle the Qashqai’s in Turkey. But for some reason, this proposal was rejected, and a military attack was put on the agenda. The Turkish ambassador prevented this huge tragedy from happening due to his close relations with Marshal Jahanbani and some officials, as well as persuading Khosro Khan Qashqai to compromise with the British ambassador. In 1963, the Turkish ambassador wrote his memoirs under the title "Hidden Leaf of Contemporary History" in Cumhuriyet newspaper. What you will read ahead is an unknown page of Qashqai history and of course a brief description of the political situation in Iran in 1943. İranın müttəfiqlər tərəfindən işğalı zamanı 150 min qaşqayın qətlə yetirilməsi Qaşqay tayfasını zamanın səhnəsindən silib, Qaşqay adını tarix səhifələrinə yazdıra bilərdi. Vaxt sürətlə keçdi, hərbi təyyarələr partlayıcılarla dolu idi və general-leytenant Cahanbaninin komandanlığı altında olan silahlı qüvvələr qaşqayları mühasirəyə almağa hazır idi. Bir anlıq gecikmə türk tayfalarının birinin taleyini dəyişməyə kifayət edə bildi. Qətliamın qarşısını almaq üçün Camal Husnu Tarai İngiltərənin Tehrandakı səfirinə təklif etdi ki, biz qaşqayları Türkiyədə məskunlaşdıra bilərik. Amma bəzi səbəblərdən bu təklif rədd edildi və hərbi hücum gündəmə gətirildi. Türkiyə səfiri general-leytenant Cahanbani və bəzi məmurlarla yaxın münasibətləri, habelə Xosrov Xan Qaşqayı Britaniya səfiri ilə güzəştə getməyə razı salması sayəsində bu böyük faciənin qarşısını aldı. Türkiyə səfiri 1963-cü ildə “Cümhuriyyət” qəzetində “Yaxın tarixdən gizli qalmış bir yarpaq” adı ilə xatirələrini yazıb. Qarşıda oxuyacağınız yazı Qaşqay tarixinin naməlum səhifəsi və təbii ki, 1943-cü ildə İrandakı siyasi vəziyyətin qısa təsviridir.

The uprising of Turkish Kurds against the government of this country in the first half of the 1920s turned into a dangerous crisis for the Turkish government, and the Turkish government made many efforts to completely suppress the rebels. Atatürk, who needed to calm down and eliminate any claimant in order to promote his Western ideas, started suppressing the Kurds with the idea of pan-Turkism and gained the support and cooperation of the Iranian government due to the neighborhood and the presence of the Kurds in Iran. The Kurdish rebellion threatened the security and territorial integrity of Iran due to its border with Turkey and affected the territorial disputes between Iran and Turkey. This study seeks to answer these questions using the descriptive-analytical method What were the causes of the Kurdish uprising in Turkey? What effect has the Kurdish rebellion of Turkey had on Tehran-Ankara relations? In examining the history of Iran-Turkey relations, it is found that these two countries, under the influence of the global reform process on the one hand, as well as the presence of two great powers, England and Russia, in the region, were experiencing similar domestic and foreign situations and were influenced by each other's situations in some cases. In particular, the impressionability of Iran from the process of transformations and reforms in Turkey, due to the influence of some Iranian officials during Pahlavi's period on this process, played a significant role in forming relations between Iran and Turkey.

Translation typesText translationSource text1,119 / 5,000Translation resultsThe present article analyzes and examines the important phenomenon of cultural reforms in the contemporary history of the Islamic world, which, despite many similarities, faced completely different fates. In the study of cultural reforms in Afghanistan and Turkey, it is known to some extent that there are many similarities in the process of cultural reforms in the two countries; The same necessity of cultural change, a single goal and having a single model are examples of similarities in the cultural reforms of the time of Amanullah and Atatürk. However, this phenomenon had a completely different purpose; With the aim of fighting against tradition and joining western modernity, Atatürk achieved relative success in this field, unlike Amanullah who faced complete failure in this way. Looking at this issue with the method of description and comparative analysis discussed in this article shows that despite the apparent similarities of this project, there were important differences that Amanullah Khan wanted to follow Kemal Atatürk without paying attention to. And because of this, he could not succeed. The cultural changes of the society without taking into consideration the value judgments of being good or bad, require variables and contexts, without paying attention to them, no lasting transformation will take place. And this can be effective in analyzing the current and future situation of Afghanistan.More about this source textSource text required for additional translation informationSend feedbackSide panels

The important Treaty of Kars, signed between the governments of Turkey, the Soviet Union, Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Georgia on October 13, 1921, led to the transfer of Nakhjavan to the Republic of Azerbaijan. After the First World War, the Armenians first took political-military steps to annex Nakhjavan to the fledgling Republic of Armenia. However, all their efforts failed due to the presence of strong rivals such as the Soviet Union and Turkey. As a result, the Treaty of Kars not only created a new political unit in the Caucasus, but also from a geopolitical point of view, led to the formation of a new political geography in northwestern Iran. The present descriptive-analytical study, using a historical method based on library and archival documents, mainly aimed to show how the sequence of the events of the early years of World War I influenced the formation of the political unit of Nakhjavan. Therefore, this study concerns the possible impact of the First World War on the political developments in Nakhjavan, from the Batum treaty to the Kars treaty. Although Soviet and Turkish governments were politically and militarily weak due to the consequences of the First World War, the research findings show that the common interests of both fledgling countries paved the way for starting their influence in South Caucasus by handing over Nakhjavan to the Republic of Azerbaijan to keep their further control of the region.

The Islamic Republic of Iran and Turkey, as two regional powers, have long been recognized as the two main rivals in the Middle East. In recent years, Iran-Turkey relations have always been a mixture of interaction and competition. Meanwhile, one of the issues that in recent years has somehow reflected the competitive dimension between the Islamic Republic of Iran and Turkey is Iraq and the political developments in this country. During the political developments in Iraq, the Islamic Republic of Iran and Turkey in many cases took a contradictory approach to the political developments in this country. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to explain the strategies of the Islamic Republic of Iran and Turkey towards Iraq and its political developments in the post-Saddam era. In this regard, the author, using a descriptive-analytical method and a comparative approach, has sought to answer the fundamental question of what approach the Islamic Republic of Iran and Turkey have taken to the political developments in Iraq? The opportunity to answer this question is that Turkey has tried to shift the balance in its favor by supporting Sunni and Kurdish Arab groups. The Islamic Republic of Iran has also tried to maintain the balance in its favor by supporting Shiite and Kurdish groups.

The security consequences of Armenia  slaughter which is recalled as the term "genocide " by many  researchers, had influential security  consequences. This is very important for us as Iranians in the respect that Iran is in the neighborhood of Armenia and Turkey governments, also it has good relations with these countries. Thus realizing the causes and roots of this event remove the uncertainties regarding the requests from parties to decode the issue.However it still is viewed as one of the most ambiguous and painful historical disasters.The main question in this research is that what are the results and consequences of Osmani and Armenia  confrontation in 1915 over the boundaries of Iran with Armenia and Turkey? In this disaster of genocide there were three groups of  opponents,advocates and impartials. Most advocates of genocide believe that this historical event is on the same degree as the Holucust against Jewishs. With respect to the lack of material and emotional compensation for Osmani and today's Turkey and also rejecting the happening of genocide in this event,this has had a negative impact on the relationships between Turkey and Armenia and continuing the conflicts in these two countries relations can make the boundaries of Iran,Turkey and Armenia insecure. In this writing some  researchers have examined the objectives of Osmani government in this event and explained the nationalistic,geographical,military and religious porpuses to introduce Osmani government as the main element of compulsory migration and slaughtering millions of  Armenians in a scientific and documentary way.