جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « dignity » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

In order to think more carefully about the roots of foreign policy formation in Iranian political culture, it is inevitable to have a theoretical foundation. To seek honor (action), the dignified foreign policy of the Safavid era (Shah Ismail Safavid) as the first historical example of honor in contemporary Iranian foreign policy. Dear readers of this article, by analyzing the issues raised in it, you can very well trace the connection between the theoretical level and the practical level in the history of contemporary Iranian foreign policy and achieve useful results.Therefore, the present article, using the analytical concept of "dignity" and with a historical approach and descriptive-analytical approach, seeks to prove the hypothesis that other concepts besides gaining power and security such as "dignity" are able to explain Iran's foreign policy during the Safavid period. Therefore, the main question of the present study is whether concepts other than the acquisition of "power" and "security" such as "dignity" with the three components of "voluntary limitation in conflict", "identity priority" and "dignity seeking" are possible. Explains Iran's foreign policy during the Safavid period?

Dignity and the being of anti-arrogance state, which are the two basic elements in the statement of the second step of the revolution, need to be well explained based on the teachings of the Qur'an. Therefore, the purpose of the research is to explain the dignity and the steate mentioned and its various aspects in the statement of the second step of the revolution with the focus on verse 29 of Surah Fath. This research achieved the results by descriptive-analytical method that; being of anti-arrogance state, the preservation of dignity and independence are inherent in human nature. Therefore, based on the teachings of the above verse and the statement of the second step, by relying on economic, cultural, political and domestic capital authority, it is possible to prevent any infidel encroachment on the Islamic world and guarantee the dignity and independence of Muslims. In such a way that Muslims are not dependent on outside of Islamic society and are able to maintain their dignity and originality, and the state of being anti-arrogance, which is one of the essential components of social justice and anti-oppression, can lead to the denial of foreign domination.

The purpose of this study is to read the political culture from Ayatollah Khamenei’s opinion. In this regard, with the descriptive-analytical method and theoretical model of Almond and Verba, Ayatollah Khamenei's cultural statements and views in three areas: "cognition", "identity" and "assessment" are examined and then the desired political culture in his thought is explained and delineated. The results show that in Ayatollah Khamenei's thought, political culture under the influence of monotheistic worldview and Islamic anthropology has been reproduced by forming elements such as freedom, rationality and supervision, and the model of dignity-oriented political culture.

Of discussions raised in the political jurisprudence is the obligatory triangle of dignity, wisdom, and expediency as the framework and the policy governing the international interactions of the Islamic state, and despite great emphasis on it, the jurisprudential foundations of these yardsticks and the explanation of the relations between them are not so clear. Since no extensive and integrated research into this subject has been carried out, inquiries about the jurisprudential foundations of the international interactions of the Islamic state is the subject which needs to be explored to the extent that appropriate answers are provided for the unanswered questions. Reliance on the analysis based on the rational judgement and the revealed doctrines, the aforementioned standards as the most fundamental principles and rules in the realm of international interactions together with their theoretical and epistemological principles, are established. The significance and status of the principle of dignity signifies its position at the top of hierarchy as it is based on the principles of wisdom and expediency. The present research has been conducted to cast light on the boundaries of the arguments and on the explanation and analysis of the jurisprudential foundations of dignity, wisdom and expediency and their extensions by signification. This aim can be achieved in light of the description and analysis of the jurisprudential statements through collecting library data which result in the analysis of the jurisprudential documentations of the abovementioned yardsticks and in the explanation of the relation each yardstick has with another one

We should more seriously consider the revisionist approach in foreign policy of states in the theory of International Relations. it, also, is necessary to be studied in a post-structuralist approach with respect to immaterial motives. Richard Ned Lebow’s spirit-based theory, which explains the controversy and challenge in the International Relations arena based on the concept of spirit and motives and its motivations, provides a good framework for studying the state's revisionist attitudes in the field of foreign policy and International Relations. Ned Lebow's theory can also be a good framework for analyzing the foreign policy of the I.R.Iran as a revisionist state. This paper seeks to answer the question that how does the spirit direct governments towards revisionism in International Relations according to Ned Lebow's theory? In response, the essay hypothesized that the soul, through motivations and motives of dignity, pride and greatness, leads governments to revisionism in international relations.

Some believe that in the years after the Islamic Revolution, their preservation and self-respect in foreign policy have been superior to national interests, and national interests have often been neglected. But it should be said that this amount of attention and dignity can be derived from the "decent dignitaries" of Iranians. In fact, this is not necessarily after the Islamic Revolution, but for centuries, has been implicated in Iran's engagement with the outside world, which can be called the Safavits era as one of the first manifestations of the experience of a strategic culture of domination in contemporary Iran's foreign policy. Therefore, the present article, using the analytical concept of "dignity" and with a historical and descriptive analytical approach, seeks to prove that other concepts, other than the acquisition of power and security, such as "dignity," have the ability to explain Iranian foreign policy during the Safavits period And, in the end, the main question of the current research is whether other concepts, other than the acquisition of "power" and "security", such as "pride", along with the three components of "self-imposed restriction in conflict", the "priority of identity" and "dignity" have the capability for the explanation of Iran's foreign policy during the Safavits era?

Sunni Muslim jurisprudents have examined the purposes of the Shari'ah in the three Zarouri, Haji, and Tahsini branches and have each expressed many comparisons. On the other hand, two constitutional rights can be regarded as the right to life and the right to liberty, and on the basis of these two rights, in the light of the Shari'ah, two fundamental principles are established as the principle of human dignity and the principle of equality of human beings. To this end, the fundamental values of Islam and the related principles, laws and jurisprudential rules such as the principle of al-Hariyah, the principle of non-dominance, the principle of non-authority, the principle of reluctance, the origin of human rights, the position of the people in their government and their rights and authorities, meritocratic proof in Islamic jurisprudence has been studied from the viewpoint of jurisprudents in the form of " Rule of Al-Ahliyyah", "Al-Nisihah to Muslims Imams", etc., and it has been shown that jurisprudence, in addition to the individual domain and the private relations of individuals, is credited to the collection of religious teachings. The regulation of human life in the fields of society, politics and government has a comprehensive agenda and more than what has been termed as contemporary constitutional rights with a history of approximately two centuries, Islam has dedicated it to humanity some fifteen centuries ago. One of the most important topics in the field of fundamental rights, individual rights and public freedoms, is dealt with in this article.