جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "نسخه شناسی" در نشریات گروه "کتابداری و مدیریت اطلاعات"

The Book Al-Kashkul is written by Bahāʾ al-Dīn Muhammad ʿAmilī known as Sheikh Bahāʾi. This book is one of the valuable and precious works of Sheikh Bahāʾi and is considered as a mirror of his knowledge and inspiration. According to the researches, the date of its writing was between 988 and 1029 AH and has been organized in a collection of five sections which include various scientific terms in an irregular format in verse and prose in Arabic and Persian, a mixture of the hadiths of the Holy Prophet (PBUH) and the infallible imams, philosophical, theological, ethical, mystical, exegesis, hei’at (traditional astronomy), astronomy texts, geometric proofs, syntactical rules, anecdotes, historical materials, poems, etc. and nearly a hundred manuscripts of this book have been identified so far. Examining the manuscripts shows that this book is accompanied by a lot of confusion and disorganization in terms of the text, such that most of its manuscripts are not consistent and harmonious in terms of arrangement, and there is no proper logical order in these manuscripts. In addition to the descriptions of the content of the book and the brief introduction of the author and the genealogy of Kashkul, this study, through a descriptive-analytical method, seeks to examine the features of the selected manuscripts, of this work in terms of the text, the composition of the content, the features of the new correction, and the shortcomings of its former correction.

In this research, by comparing the features of the Qur'anic manuscripts of the Herat method in the Timurid and Safavid periods, it was seeking to identify the prescription pillars of these Qurans, and based on that, it identified other Qurans whose authorship and artistic style were unknown.

This research has been carried out in terms of developmental goal and descriptive and analytical method with purposive sampling from among 21000 Quranic manuscripts available in the manuscripts’ treasure of Astan Quds Razavi Library, which is the statistical population of this research. Due to the lack of access to the original sources, the information gathering tool is the library catalogs and the information checklist obtained from the objective Qurans, which is based on the analysis of the bibliographic information of the reference and precious the Qurans of this course.

Based on the characteristics of the scribe's promotion and the bibliographic information of the library catalog from the Timurid period, Quranic booklet 416 and Mushaf No. 153 and from the Safavid period Mushaf No. 281, 206 and 210 from the Herat method were identified as reference and Musahafs. Their bibliographic information was analyzed in a comparative manner and finally it was determined that among all the features and pillars of bibliographic science, four features of the decorations of the Fatiha al-Kitab tablet, the script of the surahs, the decorations accompanying the text of the Quran and the composition of motifs from are the most important features that can be used to identify the Qur'anic manuscripts of this method of art in the researched periods.

By studying the findings of the research, it was found that it is possible to identify the Masahifs of the Herat method based on the elements of epistemology. The results of this research determined that: 1) the design of the Fatih al-Kitab surah, these decorations took up more space on the page in the Safavid period, and the margin of the tablet is two-part wide with an azure background and narrow with a black background, and a half-orange is drawn on the margin and the beginning of the surah is in Rafa's script. In the Timurid period, an azure part and a nim- toranj motif are not drawn on the border, and the head of the surah is decorated with Kufic script. 2) The decorations accompanying the Qur'an text, khoms va ‘ashar in the Timurid period are in the form of an almond and a circle, respectively, while in the Safavid period it is in the form of a circle. 3) The composition of motifs, in the Timurid period, is dominated by Islamic motifs and Roman motifs, but in the Safavid period, alvan Khatai motifs were drawn.

AbstractThe dialectic book of "Aljavāhir Li- Maserrat-ul-Khavātir" is a mathnavi written in 759 verses on the jewels debate with each other to show their superiority. This work is composed by Basiri in his journey to Roman city on 907 Hejira calender. He presented it to Ottoman king Bäyazīd or his boy, king Mohammad. There is only one manuscript (No. 10143) of this book hold in Marāshi Najafi library. The text is handwritten by Nastaliq calligraphy with fantastic headlines and golded tabular pages. The present descriptive- analytical article was done by using of library references to, firstly, analyze the manuscript features and, then, describe its thematic, literal and linguistic style. Results showed that in respect of writing style, it follows the styles common on 10th and 11th centuries. Its thematic style involves debates or discussions on gemology, instructive and moral issues and the poet's life story. The author's ethical attitude and his life circumstances disclose some hidden aspects of his life. From a lexical viewpoint, it includes some new coined or less applicable words, as well as extensive using of gemology- related words. Homonymy, anagram, metonymy, simile, phonotactics, letterplay especially to prettify, reference to verses and poems of the precedent poets are some techniques used by the author to make his work tuneful and more affluent.

Sadr Al-Din Mohammad b. Ibrahim b. Yahya Qawami Shirazi, also known as Mulla Sadra left behind a number of handwritings. These manuscripts represent either his original works or his copies of other authors' works. This article aims to introduce one of these manuscripts which is a 13-leave book and includes a selection of Mowlavi's Masnavi-yi Ma'navi poems. It is kept in Shiraz's Pars Museum and neither the scribe's signature nor the date of composition is available. This manuscript is not included in Mulla Sadra's lists of manuscripts or works.The present study investigated the codicology and the attribution of the script of Mowlavi's Masnavi-yi Ma'navi's selected manuscript to Mulla Sadra Shirazi. Thus, the historical evidence of this manuscript was first discussed and then its script and the visual features were mentioned. The aforementioned manuscript includes selected verses of second to fourth books of Masnavi-yi Ma'navi.This manuscript was written when Mulla Sadra engaged in his studies. The binding date of the current manuscript can be traced back to the late 19th century. Within this time, Mirza Abu-Talib Razavi presented this manuscript to Mutamid al-Dawlah, the sovereign of Fars. During the reign of Farhad Mirza Mutamid al-Dawlah, Mirza Abu Talib Razavi assumed the position of head of the Fars Court of Justice. The additional date of of the beginning note of the manuscript coincides with the reign of Uwais Mirza Ehtesham al-Dawlah, the son of Farhad Mirza, as ruler of Fars. He also held the designation of Mutamid al-Dawlah.

There seems to be an enormous research gap in the study of literary wordpuzzles, which practically covers various areas of inquiry from literary history and investigation into their functions and applications to the revival of manuscript copies and explanation of the rules and procedures of puzzle making. Mīrhusayn Muʿammā’ī Nishābūrī (d. 904/1499), who followed ʿAbd al-Raḥmān Jāmī in composing wordpuzzles and was a prominent puzzle maker of the 9th/15th and 10th/16th centuries himself, wrote a treatise on the rules and procedures of puzzle making entitled Dastūr-i Muʿammā. The treatise, completed in 904/1499, contains 650 literary wordpuzzles composed by the author together with brief notes on puzzle making rules and procedures. More than one hundred manuscript copies of the treatise have been preserved at libraries across Iran and the world. The complexity of the puzzles distinguishes the treatise from other works of the same genre, prompting various literary scholars to write commentaries and provide explanatory notes on the puzzles from its completion in the 10th/16th century to the 12th/18th century. In order to fill part of the research gap and revive an important treatise on word puzzles, Dastūr-i Muʿammā was critically edited on the basis of MS 4495/1 preserved at the Central Library and Documentation Center of the University of Tehran as the base copy, adopting an eclectic method of emendation and providing a systematic method for the explanation and solution of the puzzles.

The Treatise of Jami’ al-Hidayah fi ‘Ilm al-Remayah written by Nizam al-Din Ahmad bin Muhammad known as Shuja al-Din Doroodbashi Beyhaqi, which was written in 718 A.H. with subject of shooting and archery techniques, which are arranged in seventeen separate chapters. This Treatise was published for the first time by Daneshpazhooh in 1963 in “Farhang Iranzmin” magazine without correction, editing and research on its text, based on one manuscript he had; while today thirteen manuscripts of this treatise have been registered in different Iranian and foreign libraries. because this treatise has historical and content importance, the authors intend to research on the text, in addition to introducing it, to express the necessity of correcting and edited publishing of this treatise.This research has been done with descriptive-analytical method and using available library resources. Considering that the writer of this treatise was an expert in shooting and archery, the content of the treatise, also the type and style of words and military terms usage in it are significant, and recording theme in dictionaries has a lot of importance to enrich the Persian language in this field; Also, this treatise is complementary to other treatises in this content, which prepares the way for more complete researches in this field. Regardless of the frequent use of special shooting and archery words in it, this treatise is devoid of outstanding linguistic features. Also, the prose of this treatise is eloquent, which in some cases is accompanied by verses from prominent poets of Persian literature.

Mohammad Amin Riyahi the editor of Mirsad-o-Ebad, choic the Bursa manuscript as a basic manuscript in the correction of this work and who write that the Raisol Kottab manuscript is a old manuscript. Review between to manuscript, show that S manuscript in some dimentions prefer to BU manuscript. One of the preference aspects is the musical principle of this manuscription. The musical principle one of the basic aspects in expression style of Mirsad-o-Ebad and this aspect Has been carefully considered in S manuscription with compare by BU manuscript.in other hand Lingustic and stylistic aspects of Mirsad-o-Ebad much attended in S manuscript and this manuscript show the old lingustic aspect of Mirsad-o-Ebad. Beside of this records of poems from auther and otheres that come in this work, in S manuscript is correct than of BU manuscript and s manuscript in this three aspect have a decisive preference to BU manuscript. In this article we debate around this subject.

Molla Ahmad Naraghi (died 1244 or 1245 AH) is one of the greatest jurists of Iran in the early Qajar era. In addition to authoring numerous works in jurisprudence and principles of jurisprudence, mainly in Arabic, he also left valuable works in Persian literature and ethics. Molla Ahmad's Me’raj al-Sa’adat, which is a free translation (from Arabic to Persian) of his father Molla Mohammad Mahdi's book entitled Jame’ al-Sa’adat with additions and changes, has a special place among Persian moral books. In addition to the fact that many manuscripts of this book have reached us, it has been printed many times in Lithography and etc. However, there is no edited text of this book based on scientific criteria. The most reliable and famous edition of it was published by Hejrat Publications (without the editor's name) in 1378 "with correction, research, comment and editing". Various faults can be seen in this edition, which shows carelessness in editing and research. In this article, we will criticize this edition from different perspectives of edition, stylistics and the principles of text correction, and we will present our suggestions for its editing.

The results of the analysis of ancient manuscripts show that the term Inha’ was originally used to convey the message. The term was gradually used to refer to textual traditions, beginning in about the sixth century AH. The findings of our study show that in the seventh and eighth centuries AH, this term became widespread among Muslim scholars and found different meanings .After the eighth century AH, Inha’ became very popular and became a well-known term, though with different uses, in the field of textual research. In general, the term of Inha’ represents three specific uses: first, the approval of the manuscript; in these cases, Inha’s notes mean that the manuscript has been reviewed. Second means editing the manuscript; in these cases, Inha’s notes means that the person or persons have read and edited the manuscript. The third meaning that is more recent is the concept of description and interpretation of the manuscript text. In these cases, the person who writes the Inha’ note either describes the manuscript himself or states that another person has described the manuscript.

In a good many manuscripts and amended Divans of Hafiz, there appears a ghazal beginning thus: دوش از مسجد سوی میخانه آمد پیر ما چیست یاران طریقت بعد از این تدبیر ما This ghazal, according to many editors and experts on Hafiz, genuinely belongs to him, and there are even a good few scholars who believe that Hafiz has written this ghazal under the influence of Attar’s story about Sheikh-e San’ān. However, Mohammad Amin Riahi is of the opinion that this ghazal has been unjustifiably added to Hafiz’s Divan. Also, in his edition of the poet’s Divan, Salim Neisāri has placed this ghazal separately among the verses believed to have been added to the Divan at a later time. In the present study, the aforementioned ghazal is examined based on two important textological principles: codicology and stylistics so that authenticity level of the ghazal becomes clear.

The endless story of Hafez's speech in recent century has been done in countless studies and researches and everyone has examined the themes in some way in her words and has published them. One of the topics that was widely studied and researched in the middle years of the last century was the publication of several books on the emendation of Divan-e-Hafez. A group of proofreaders tried to emend Divan-e-Hafez with the help of older versions and sometimes to their own taste and remove the dust of distortions of copyists and scribes from the face of the original verses. One of these researches is the Divan-e-Hafez with the description and margins of Houshang Ebtehaj, which due to the fame and background of its author in the description of some major texts of Persian literature, is worth pondering. Because of Since the publication of this book, several steps have been taken to critique and introduce it, by reading them, the author intends to represent different views on the latest version of Hafez's poems. The purpose of this article is to present various theories about "Hafez to the effort of Sayeh" and also to review these theories to achieve a better understanding of the approach of the corrector of this work. Hence, we have reviewed the research that has been written about this work and have shown this version, has good reasons for introducing itself and can be the closest version to the old version and Hafez.

Writers of manuscripts in various era due to the diffrent resaons have had a mistakes in texts.This mistakes and conversion in some cases have resulted from the low literary and linguistic knowledge of writers and in other hand have resulted from the carelessness and Impatience of writers and in some cases have been intentional.Because of,often have seen mistakes like this in literary works especially poet divans and other texts.Khaqanis divan isnt excluding from this rule. His divan as well as Difficulty and hardness than other poetry divans and this subject have been the source many mistakes in his divan.Origin of some mistakes in the writing o khaqanis divan have been because of unfamilitry with khaqanis literary style as rhetorical and imagery originality.In other hand,Allusions to some scientific opinions and trusts of poet era as medical and astronomical hints and other historical,folklore and folk beliefes added to the complexity of khaqanis poem and correctly writing has become difficult and mistakes with a this seen in manuscripts.The result of the research makes clear that writers of late manuscripts,tehran and paris manuscripts have had a many mistakes in text with compare old manuscripts of this divan.

In this article -- which represents a search into the history of developments made in the texts of manuscripts -- first, based on the historical sources and another manuscript copied by the scribe of the Shahnameh, dated 741 H. (MS n.6006 at Cairo Dar al-kotob), it is made clear that this scribe is Shams al-Din Kishi’s grandson and hails from a Sufi knowledge- loving family. Then, by comparing this manuscript with two others and conducting a statistical examination of our findings, it becomes evident that the transcriber of the Cairo MS is inclined to manipulate the text of the MS in order to make it approximate his own religious convictions. In particular, he deletes verses that he recognizes as “non-Islamic”.Finally, it is argued that attempts to bring the Shahnameh in conformity with Islam have a long history among the Sufis and, thus, this scribe’s act can perhaps be explained in the context of those attempts.This study can serve as a rudimentary example for similar studies which would demonstrate how the text of Iran’s national epic has been understood during the long history of is being transcribed, read and handed down and what the medieval audience had expected of this work.

Qorrat al-’ayn or Qorrat al-’oyun, is one of the old Persian texts written on the comparison of Arabic sayings with their Persian counterparts and with Qor’anic verses. The writing of this book seems to have taken place around the latter half of the 6th H./12 CE, probably by an author named Qāzi ūsh. Of this work there are a good number of copies in various libraries all over the world, the oldest of which, until recently, was believed to be the MS dated 722 H. at the Fāteh Librar y, Istanbul. Nonetheless, there exists a MS in a collection belonging to Jalal al-Din Homā’i that is dated 651 H. presently kept at Iran’s National Library.
In this article, the features of the manuscript and its importance in conducting a second emendation of the Qorrat al-’ayn and the establishing of its composition date have been inspected.

This research Studies the Manuscripts Available in terms of their codicological& bibliography. The codicological features: script, date and place of transcription, type of cover and ornamentation, also bibliography Information: language, types of manuscripts,subject and Similar Titles.
Design/Methodology/Approach: The research is descriptive with Content analysis type, research population, the number of 639 manuscripts in the document center of Shahidbahonar University of Kerman
Findings: There are 1012 treatise in 639 volumes of manuscripts that 121 collection (%18.93),The more manuscripts (%60.4) in Arabic. Religious Sciences with 54 percent, the highest share was allocated to the subject. A majority of the manuscripts(26%) are related to the 13thHijri.. The transcription place of most (%87) of these manuscripts is in Iran territory. The most commonly used type of script (%44) is Naskh. The most popular type of cover(%43)used for these manuscripts is Leather binding and the most infrequent type is laqured binding.. The oldest manuscript belongs to the 9thHijri century. The most commonly of script is Naskh&the most of cover used is Leather bindingThereligious jurisprudence is the highest share subject.. The highest Similar Titles is "Favaedolziaeie" alsothere are 22 valuable manuscript in the research population

Edward West, who, for the first time, translated and published Manuchahr’s Middle Persian letters into English together with some other works, has classified the letters into two categories: the first category has been taken from the manuscript N0.35, collected Pahlavi and Avestan manuscripts at Copenhagen University; the second, containing the manuscripts that, according to West’s investigation, have been copied from the manuscript No. 14, the Hough’s Collection at Munich State Library. West has named these two basic manuscripts K35 and M14. Here, a brief review of these two categories and their sub-collections is presented and, then, a few other manuscripts including the text under discussion will be introduced.

One of the debatable issues about Mawlana’s Great Divan is the presence in it of a number of Turkish verses. Some studies have been undertaken on this topic. Nevertheless, most scholars have limited themselves to the translation of those verses disregarding the textological and stylistic aspects of the ghazals containing such verses. A study of this question is thus wanting in the area of Turkish literature. In the present investigation, after making some introductory remarks, reviewing the previous research on the problem, evaluating the extent of Mawlana’s Turkish writing and his knowledge of the language, and some discussion on the frequency of Turkish poetry in the Divan, the Turkish verses and their meaning are dealt with, and the prevalence of the Turkish expressions shown. Then, under “textological study”, the most accurate manuscripts of the Divan-e ghazaliyat-e Shams, and the frequency of the Turkish ghazals in those manuscripts are indicated. In the end, the stylistic aspects of the ghazals are addressed.

The most difficult part of codicology is analyzing the specifications of the paper used in a manuscript, which contains a part of the manuscript's historical background and identity. However, manuscript cataloguers have not done any analytical study to present precise criteria and standards for determining the type of paper used in manuscripts. Therefore the present study is done to compensate for this shortcoming.Design/Methodology/Approach: The present research first introduces different types of papers used by Muslims and Iranians for creating manuscripts and books. It then reviews some common types of papers used in manuscripts, the specifications of these papers, and the approximate period in which each of them was popular. In the next part examples of the manuscripts which possess each of the described specifications are introduced.

Library and Archives of Iran (NLAI) in terms of their codicological features, including date and place of transcription, type of paper and script. This research studies the manuscripts available in the digital library of the NationalDesign/ Methodology/Approach: The research population consisted of 3,853 manuscript records available on the website of the digital library of the NLAI. Content analysis was employed as the method for this study. The transcription place of most (70.83%) of these manuscripts is Iran’s territory in that era. The most popular type of paper (72.59%) used for these manuscripts is European paper. Also the most commonly used type of script (64.31%) is Nasta’liq and the most infrequent type of script used in these manuscript is Latin (0.05%). Results show that the oldest manuscripts belongs to the Eleventh century A.D. and" western paper has the highest consumption rate. Also, findings show that "NASTALIGH script is of the mostly used scripts in manuscripts. A majority (71.22%) of the manuscripts are related to the 13th Hijri century (19th century).

The outliving manuscripts have not enjoyed the same future. Although some manuscripts are favored with accurate information paving the way for researchers’ studies, for a considerable number of which, there is not enough information available. Some manuscripts are wrongly associated with false authors; the real authors of which are anonymous. A great number of manuscripts have been partly or wholly destroyed by natural and unnatural phenomena as well. The present study aims at evaluating the data reported from manuscripts adopting a method which has recently been referred to as ‘Reverse Engineering’ in engineering sciences. Through this method, based on ‘mere technology’ or ‘technology accompanied by other majors and fields of study’, it would be possible to increase the scientific facets of codicologistic studies. Consequently, it would be possible to report on the non-authenticity or counterfeiters of manuscripts. the researcher has tried to utilize the books and articles available in the two majors of “Librarianship Sciences” as well as “Engineering Sciences.” It can be concluded that the borderlines between phraseology, research, and the criticism are not crystal-clear revealing a direct relationship between reverse engineering and codicology.