جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "بروندادهای علمی" در نشریات گروه "پزشکی"

Librarians, as practitioners of Library and Information Science (LIS), by playing various roles, can contribute to the promotion of research and expansion of human knowledge. The aim of the present study was to investigate librarians' scientific publications indexed in the Scopus database between 2016 and 2020 using the scientometric approach.

The present study, which was conducted using a scientometric approach, is descriptive in terms of data collection and applied in terms of the objective. The research population was all articles indexed in the Scopus database in 2016-2020 in which the word "librarian" is included in at least one of the authors’ organizational affiliations. The number of these articles amounted to 2207 after review and screening by the researchers.

In general, librarians accounted for 1.5% of the worldwide scientific production in the field of LIS. Librarians were the first, second or third author in more than 60% of the articles analyzed. Totally, 61% of the articles by librarians were published in non-LIS disciplines such as biological sciences, medicine, and computer science, and the chi-square test showed that the participation of librarians was significantly higher in non-LIS disciplines than in LIS disciplines (p<0.001). A closer examination of the articles indexed by librarians in the Scopus database in the LIS subject area showed that scientometrics, library services, databases, archives, and knowledge management were the most interesting topics for librarians with a frequency of 134, 131, 84, 75 and 59 articles, respectively.

Librarians as research assistants have made an important contribution to the writing of articles from non-LIS fields in recent years. Moreover, scientometrics has been one of the main topics of their research in the LIS field.

Sharing resources and facilities, leveraging each other's experiences, and enabling interdisciplinary research are the benefits of co-authorship. The aim of this study was to investigate the co-authorship status of the scientific productions by Afghan researchers to plan the expansion of collaboration and employment of these researchers in migration destination countries, especially Iran.

This quantitative study examined 2732 articles indexed in Scopus with at least one Afghan author from the beginning of indexing in Scopus to September 2021. Statistical methods and analysis of the co-authorship network were used to analyze the data, via Python 3 language and VOSviewer 1.6.17 and Gephi 0.9.2.

The most scientific outputs of Afghan researchers are devoted to the writings of the medical field with 40.41%. The next scientific fields with a large difference are social sciences (15.67%), biological sciences (11.16%), and engineering (10.94%), respectively. The co-authorship network of Afghan researchers and their colleagues consisted of 13,379 nodes (researchers) and 2,511,879 weighted edges (co-author relationships). Afghan researchers collaborated most frequently with researchers from the United States. Iran, despite its geographic and cultural proximity, ranks fourth among its colleagues. America is followed by England and India.

Co-authorship varies among researchers in different scientific fields. The median number of authors of each article in dentistry, biochemistry and other majors close to medicine and basic sciences was about three times that of theoretical majors such as social sciences, arts and humanities.

Scientometric studies are one of the most efficient methods of scientific evaluation in a valid scientific database. Therefore, the aim of this study was to analyze the co-word analysis of scientific outputs in the field of bibliotherapy in the Web of Science (WoS).

This scientometric study was conducted using library methods and network analysis. The statistical population of this study included all documents indexed in the WoS with the subject of bibliotherapy from 1975 to 2020. Data were analyzed using Excel, Pajek, UCINET, Netdraw and VOSviewer softwares.

The results showed that the scientific outputs in the field of bibliotherapy had no appropriate growth rate, and the growth rate of the total scientific outputs in this field was 3%. The field of "psychology" was the most active one with the production of 49% of bibliotherapy studies. Based on the study of the co-word network in the field of bibliotherapy, six thematic clusters were identified. The "Bibliotherapy for children" cluster with 1013 keywords was recognized as the largest cluster, and the "Bibliotherapy" keyword with 543 frequencies was the most frequent keyword. The "Bibliotherapy" and "Depression" keywords with 153 frequencies had the most co-word occurrence. The network density was 1.26. Moreover, the keywords of bibliotherapy, depression and self-help had the highest rank centrality (100, 85.417 and 82.292), betweenness centrality (11.194, 5.378 and 4.310) and closeness centrality (100, 87.273 and 84.956), respectively.

The trend of bibliotherapy studies was poor, and the medical fields had not paid much attention to its use in the treatment of diseases. Therefore, it is necessary for health policy makers to take the necessary plans to improve and strengthen bibliotherapy studies in all areas.

Assessing the quality of scientific outputs is part of the development measuring system of countries around the world. The aim of this study was to analyze the thematic structure of the top articles of Iranian researchers in the Web of Science (WoS) database in Web of Science database.

This applied-descriptive study was performed using scientometric method. The research population was all top papers of Iranian researchers indexed in Essential Scientific Indicators (ESI) and WoS databases from 2010 to 2019. Data were analyzed using Ravar Matrix and Ucinet softwares.

Total number of Iranian top articles was 2447 of which 2428 and 114 were highly cited and hot articles published from 2010-2019, respectively. The top ranking of centrality was assigned to the keyword "nanofluid" with a closeness centrality of 53.684, betweenness centrality of 24.229 and degree centrality of 3.020%.

The top articles of Iranian researchers were classified into 14 thematic clusters, so that most of these articles were in the field of "engineering" and the keyword "nano" was the most important thematic keyword and the basic foundation of this study.

The aim of this study was to analyze the descriptive and content structure of scientific outputs produced by fisheries researchers of Iranian universities in the Web of Science (WoS) from 1990 to 2020.

This scientometric study was performed using co-word analysis method. The population of this research consisted of 1755 fisheries documents, published during 1990-2020 and indexed in the WoS so that at least one of the researchers had organizational affiliation with Iranian universities and research centers. The data were analyzed using Excel, and the thematic maps of this area were drawn using VOSviewer.

The findings showed that Iran was ranked 25th in international fisheries scientific outputs; in this list, the United States, Japan and Canada were ranked first to third in the world, respectively. Moreover, the findings indicated that Iran had the highest number of scientific outputs in 2017. Among the universities and research centers of Iran, Islamic Azad University, Tehran University and Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources had the highest rate of scientific outputs, respectively. The researchers published the most documents in the Iranian Journal of Fisheries Sciences, Journal of Applied Ichthyology and Aquaculture Research. In the study of the co-word network analysis of Iranian fisheries, 10 thematic clusters were identified.

Social network analysis of word concepts has suggested that the highest centrality indicators of fisheries studies is associated with marine biology, aquatics reproduction, aquaculture, aquatics safety system, quality of food products, pathogens in aquatics, pollution of aquatic environments, physiological indicators of stress, aquatics nutrition and salinity stress.

Since the aim of health research is to improve the quality of community life, the results obtained from these research could be used in health policies and practices. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the bibliometric and content analysis of research relevant to health education and promotion performed in Iran during 1998-2011.
This is a descriptive content analysis study. Data were collected from online databases (IranMedex, Medlib, SID, ISI, and PubMed), and all published articles relevant to health education and promotion in Iran up to the end of March 2011 were included in this study. In order to do content analysis a researcher-made checklist approved by experts was used for identifying the variables. Data was entered into SPSS 21 and descriptive statistics and percents were calculated.
From 1227 documents retrieved, 817 were published in Persian and 410 in English. A great share of retrieved documents belonged to the articles published in the scientific journals (87.4%). Mental health (10.7%), family planning and reproductive health (10.2 %), and chronic non-communicable diseases (10.2%) were the most frequent subject areas in research relevant to health promotion, respectively. Most of the studies were cross-sectional (52.1%), the most widely used method was simple random sampling (27.7%), and most of the studies were performed locally in provinces (83.7%).
Doing more studies by outlining the exact perspective of health promotion research in Iran and comparison of the current status of Iran with that of other countries are recommended.

The quantity and quality of scientific outputs from two points of view considered thatany In its place is important. One of the outcomes of each country Articles Published in various scientific topics in prestigious journals International organizations and from the perspective of a small, representing thescientific activities Each country and qualitatively reflect the scientific strengths and is a leader. For ease Categories disciplines that are more than three thousand matures, the field due The thematic similarities in the areas of macro-placed to compare between Seminaries, universities, countries and people is possible. The division in most The world has many similarities with each other. For example, in Republic Iran's Islamic various disciplines of science is in seven major areas They are: Humanities, value and knowledge of basic sciences, medical sciences, Engineering sciences, agricultural sciences and interdisciplinary sciences. The value Sciences Knowledge and seminaries, Medical Sciences and Ministry of Health and Education Medical, and five other metropolitan areas the Ministry of Science, Research and Technology Dealers he does. The task of policy-making and planning for each area respectively with Seminaries, Ministry of Health, Treatment and Medical Education, Ministry of Science, Research and Technology.

Health and disease are the most common research variables and article subjects in medical and paramedical researchs، and in other hand، Verses and traditions are the important references to convey importace a subject for moslems. The aim of this study was to discover using Quran and Nahjolbalaghehas a reference in medical articles. This cross-sectional study was conducted among all of Babol University of Medical SciencesJournals (during 1991-2013) using citation analysis. The data were collected by means of a tailor-made data collection sheet and analyzed using descriptive statistical indexes. The outcome extracted of 786 articles from72 journals and 19069 citations (during 22 years) showed thatthe holy Quran anNahj olbalagheh were cited as a reference less than 2 percent (157 and 2 order/times، respectively). Surat Al-Baqurahwere the most frequent surahand Surat Al-Ma’ideh and Surat Al-‘Isra’ were in second grade. Overall، Quran and Nahj olbalagheh were used in composing medical articles. But the rate of such usage is limited.

Various scientometric indicators have been developed for quantitative and qualitative evaluation of scientific output. Each of these indicators has its own weaknesses and strengths. The study aimed at using the keywords as a qualitative evaluation instrument in research of many scholars of Medical Sciences University. This study was conducted as a cross-sectional study within a 6-year period (2005-2010). The research population included all papers published by faculty members of Medical Science University of Babol who were as the first/corresponding authors with at least 2 papers and these indexed articles in periodicals published in WOS during this period. The data were collected by means of a tailor-made data collection sheet. The repeated or synonym keywords were collected from different papers of an author and were analyzed in terms of repetition for qualitative evaluation of the research of every scholar. The data were analyzed by using descriptive statistical indexes and statistical software spss version16. During this period, 127 articles have been indexed in WoS database from researchers of this University. in 11 articles of 300 words, 21 repeated words or synonyms were used by 25 researchers who had two or more than two papers. By considering these findings, the overall ratio of articles with repetitive keywords was 16% and the proportion of repeated keywords to whole words was 7%.Statistical processing of the data using linear regression indicates an inverse relationship between the number of articles of each author and repeated keywords or synonyms in his/her articles. So, by increasing the number of articles for every author from 2 to 5, the repeated words in per article were decreased to 0/83, 0/77, 0/25 and finally zero, respectively. low rate of the same keywords and synonyms in the articles of one researcher may be a sign of dispersion and lack of coordination in research activities. Therefore, regarding the coordination and concentration of the subject in scientific activities is very important in assessing the quality of research and researchers.

The purpose of the present study is to trace the scientific status of researchers’ outputs in the field of parasitology as reflected in science citation databases during 1995-2010. In this study، outputs of researchers in the field of parasitology were analyzed using scientometric method. 3781 records were downloaded from the online Web of Science and then were exported to the basic dataset created for the study in a personal computer. For analyzing، data were entered into statistical and scientometric softwares such as Excel and HistCite and Interdisciplinary Research (IDR). Results show that the average growth rate in outputs of the field of parasitology during 1995-2010 is zero. The highest number of productions is in article format (3190)، and in English language (3601). The International Journal for Parasitology has the highest number of articles (2521)، the University of Melbourne with 122 articles has the highest number of productions among universities، and USA with 976 articles has the highest number of productions among countries. Gasser R. B. with 59 articles has the most articles among authors and “Parasitology Meets Ecology on its Own Terms” by Margolis et al. with 2041 has the highest number of citations. The most important cluster in parasitology field is Infection Diseases (3514) with the following subjects: Parasitology، Veterinary Sciences، Tropical Medicine، Infection Diseases، Microbiology، Immunology، and Virology. This study is a guide for researchers، experts and policy makers in the field of parasitology.