جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « نظام سلطه » در نشریات گروه « علوم سیاسی »

In connection with the ontology of Martyr Soleimani's strategies in the Islamic world, different views are presented. On the one hand, the supporters of the Neo-conservative system believe: Martyr Soleimani's strategies are due to Iran's expansionism to penetrate the Islamic world. The other side of this bipolarity, which is being published by native thinkers in the Islamic world, is based on the principle that the strategies of Martyr Soleimani are not for influence; Rather, it is for the unity of the Islamic world against the Neo-conservatism system (problem); (Study Plan). This article follows the descriptive-analytical method (Method). The Oppression Front (the system of domination) has tried to reverse this Islamic-Iranian method and the most important tool to achieve this goal is to draw the attention of the Islamic world to the ontological issues of Shahid Soleimani's strategies (providing a distorted interpretation of the strategies). Therefore, the most important thing for indigenous thinkers is to make the syntax of these strategies more visible (Findings).

Adherence to the obligations resulting from international treaties such as the United Nations Charter and the obligations arising from it, including the Security Council resolutions in the legal system of the Islamic Republic of Iran, which is influenced by the powers of the legal guardian, has different theoretical foundations from other states. Although Article 25 of the United Nations Charter obliges the member states to accept and implement the decisions of the Security Council, and the organization's practice considers at least the resolutions issued based on the seventh chapter of the Charter to be binding, however, the Islamic Republic of Iran has always been critical of the actions of this organ due to the fact that it sees most of the Security Council's decisions as detrimental to itself. Resolutions 598 and 2231 of the Security Council, the first of which ended the war and the second of which temporarily ended the nuclear conflict between Iran and the West, although it has finally been approved by the highest political authority in Iran (supreme leader), this acceptance was not done out of commitment to international obligations and requirements arising from the Charter, but simply by adhering to and appealing to political-jurisprudential standards. The investigation of this research is analytical-descriptive and the method of collecting information is library. The question of this article is about the position of the resolutions of the Security Council in the fundamental rights of the Islamic Republic of Iran, and the hypothesis that is raised is that since the system governing the Security Council is unfair, oppressive and a reflection of the system of domination in the eyes of the leaders of the Islamic Republic, therefore, the possible acceptance of the aforementioned resolutions is not based on international obligations and its norms, but on the basis of politics.

The political patterns of influence which is the result of the experience of global arrogance in overthrowing anti-imperialist regimes are the roadmap for the political influence of the domination system in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Therefore this study is in response to this question that what political patterns are used for the political influence of the domination system in the Islamic Republic of Iran, in a descriptive-analytical method, has analyzed and explained the political patterns of influence of the domination system.The results of the present study show that system of domination, after failing in a hard approach to counter the Islamic Revolution of Iran, has entered the campaign against the system of the Islamic Republic with a soft approach. And system of domination using the patterns of democratization, war of ideas, war of wills, RefoLotion, nonviolent struggle, normalization and computational battle, with the aim of transmutation and overthrowing the Islamic Revolution, and using domestic and foreign influencers, has attempted to political influence in the Islamic Republic of Iran.

One of the most important tasks of any political system is to draw efficient strategies for drawing the geometry of interactions inside the country and facing political units in the field of international relations. For such a confrontation, the strategy of the second step of the Islamic revolution, based on the statement of the supreme leader of the revolution, is known as resistance. Examining the jurisprudential foundations of resistance in the Islamic Republic can determine the way of interaction with countries, institutions and international organizations. Therefore, the main problem of the research is, what is the position of the foundations of resistance desired by Ayatollah Khamenei in the system of Shia jurisprudence and which of the jurisprudential chapters can it be explained? The most important achievement of the present research is the explanation of the jurisprudential foundations of resistance as a determining component in the political and economic equations of the Islamic society and overcoming the challenges caused by the power seeking of the global domination system. The present research pursues this hypothesis that the concept of resistance intended by Ayatollah Khamenei can be explained with different chapters of jurisprudence such as defensive jihad, taqiyyah, amrba-maaruf, and the like. This research, with a descriptive and analytical method, during discussions and topics such as confronting tyranny inside the country and negation of domination, independence, achieving modern Islamic civilization in the field of international relations, deals with the jurisprudential explanation of the foundations of resistance in order to be able to provide a reasonable and comprehensive explanation of it. Muslims and intellectuals of the Islamic world.

The purpose of this article is to extract the model of popular resistance based on the thoughts of Imam Khamenei; In order to achieve this goal, after explaining the theoretical literature, using the method of theme network analysis, Imam Khamenei's oral and written statements in the field of resistance and a total of 317 indicators; 140 components and 17 dimensions were extracted. The findings indicate that, firstly the sustainable progress of the nations without resistance at four national levels. regional, trans-regional and global and two Islamic and non-Islamic environments are not possible:And on the other hand, to immediately stabilize the position and protect the achievements of the Resistance Front in the rapid changes of the post-American era, avoiding the formation of the "Resistant Nation (RN)" organization in Tehran.And on the other hand, in order to immediately stabilize the position of the resistance front in the developments of the post-American era, there is no escaping the formation of the "Resistant Nation (RN)" organization in Tehran and the organization of all anti-dominion spectrums around the world under an official institution in 17 dimensions.

After the formation in Iran, due to Iran's ideological identity, foreign enemies have always had a strategic confrontation with Iran. Examining the actions of foreign enemies and their allies inside the country, well reveals the extent of their hostility to the Islamic Revolution. This enmity has taken a new form in each period of time, and the last case was in November 2019, which occurred after the implementation of the fuel management plan. This crisis had unique features and was unprecedented in terms of the number of cities involved in the crisis, the level of violence, and so on. But in any security incident, there are hidden reasons why their interaction leads to that incident. Therefore, recognizing the causes of the incident and the relationship between these factors can pave the way for managing the regime's future crises. For this purpose, in this research, experts were interviewed and the issues raised were analyzed by grounded theory method. The results show that the five main factors that played a major role in the occurrence of this incident are: cyberspace, global enemies planning, intelligence surprises, unplanned government, high dispersion and high crisis violence.

One of the obstacles to achieving the goals of Iran's 20-year vision plan is the actions of the ISIS in Iraq as a member of the Resistance Front. Therefore, the main purpose of this study is to identify ISIL's behavior patterns in Iraq until 2025. The findings of this research based on analytical-pragmatic and futuristic research indicate that the contradictory performance of ISIS with its stated aims (assassination and excommunication against the state-building) did not conform to the specific social and political realities of Iraq. The terrorist group does not seek to build the political and social structures of the "state" or "caliphate". Incomplete state-building is the specific function of the ISIS Takfiri group to further bolster Islamophobia. These two patterns of behavior (incomplete state-building and terror and excommunication) are exactly in line with the goals of Western powers to contain "political Islam" by "radical Islam". In the light of ISIL's behavior patterns, it is impossible for ISIL to create a caliphate in Iraq until 2025 due to internal developments and support from the resistance front. And possible Scenario is the geopolitical containment of the Resistance Front (Iran, Iraq, etc.) due to the creation of secret networks and terror.

After the Islamic Revolution, the discourse of resistance in the foreign policy of the Islamic Republic was formed under the general discourse of political-jurisprudential Islam with the central sign of pure Muhammadan Islam and with the recitation of Imam Khomeini. Efficient and realistic reaction against the system of domination and arrogance in order to secure the interests of the country. This discourse, which is defined based on the thought of the Imams of the Revolution and the native construction of the country, shows the correct way of laying in line with the ideals and goals of the Islamic Revolution for decision-making bodies in the field of foreign policy and system agents. The first step to establishing the discourse of resistance correctly and completely is to know precisely the meaning and concept of resistance and to analyze its fundamental components.The main question of the present study is related to what are the conceptual components of Islamic resistance in the thought of Imam Khamenei, the memory of God Almighty. To obtain the answer, using the method of "text-based qualitative content analysis", His Holiness's statements about the concept of "resistance" in accordance with the methodological requirements were examined.Findings show that resistance is a planned, efficient, and intelligent functional set in all cultural, economic, political, and social fields, at an individual, social, and institutional levels, in order to strengthen the existential structure of individuals and strengthen the fabric of society and government to confront the internal enemy. Individuals, including the devil and carnal obsession, on the one hand, and confrontation with the external enemy, and on top of that, the global arrogance front and the arrogance of the world, on the other hand, will lead to worldly and otherworldly happiness and perfection.

The main purpose of this article is to compare the Islamic Resistance Front and the American imperialism regime in West Asia. In the analysis of the subject, we use the comparative method with the tools of Laclau and Mouffe discourse analysis theory. In response to this hypothesis, it is proposed that the two models in question have different perceptions, perceptions and definitions of the computing system and are fundamentally different in the areas of leadership, strategic alliance, computing system, unity, method and goals. According to the research hypothesis, the research results indicate that in terms of conceptual and affirmative computing system in these two models, except in some cases, are different and different. Therefore, the strategy of active resistance and legitimate defense of the strategy of the Resistance Front against the strategy of the imperialism system means; the strategy of interventionism, aggression and a thousand wounds is to change the calculation system and disrupt the computational system of Iran and the Islamic Resistance. Essentially, America's imperialism rhetoric in West Asia by strengthening the Resistance Front "and" costly geopolitical interventions and reducing US tactical success due to regional crises, increasing interventionism, expansion of unilateralism and endless wars in the Asia Western regional environment is inevitable

The discourse of resistance as one of the major manifestations of the discourse of political-jurisprudential Islam to the central sign of pure Muhammadan Islam with the recitation of Imam Khomeini (RA), was formed in response to how the Islamic system behaves and reacts to the system of domination and Based on that, it has tried to draw the framework of the movement path of the system and its agents in the international space and the system of domination to achieve its goals. Applying the discourse of Islamic resistance in accordance with the local approach and creating an efficient decision-making apparatus in the Islamic government, firstly depends on analyzing the thought of the Supreme Leader and methodically and scientifically explaining this in his views and then providing a precise and tangible strategic-operational coordinates for using Islamic resistance. In this regard, the main question of the present study is what is the strategic-operational coordinates of Islamic resistance in the intellectual system of the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Khamenei. In order to obtain the answer, using the method of "text-based qualitative content analysis" all the statements of His Majesty after the Islamic Revolution of Iran were examined, the components of RESISTANCE were extracted and examined from his perspective, and based on that, the "strategic-operational model of Islamic resistance in the intellectual system of the Supreme Leader" has been drawn. in this study, in order to explain the pattern of resistance, resistance targets in the two areas of islamic goals and national interests, the operational requirements of resistance is met at the three levels of brokers, enemies and observers, resistance realization policies at the two levels of Inside the front and Outside the front, and finally the tools to implement policies and fulfillment of goals are explained in three

After the Islamic Revolution of Iran and its ideal perspective on regional and global developments, a coalition was formed from the West with the Sunni countries of the Persian Gulf led by Saudi Arabia and most of the Arab states against Iran. Thus, the security environment in the Middle East became the center of gravity for the protection of Iran's national interests and security threats, and Iran was forced to regionalize its power within the framework of the resistance. This axis gained double authority with the coming to power of the Iraqi Shiite government and the victory of Syria over the ISIS forces led by the United States and its supporters. Iran's security performance was timely and vigilant. Supporting Shiite groups in Yemen and Bahrain and being active in Iraq and Syria can be seen as an effort to maintain and increase the strength of the resistance-oriented security complex and to ensure Iran's national security. Currently, the security of the Islamic Republic in Palestine, Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, etc. is being seriously ensured.

In the statement of the second step, in addition to stating the achievements of the Islamic Revolution in the first forty years of the revolution, the Supreme Leader explained the hostilities committed by the West and the arrogant governments. One of the most important axes of this analysis is the expression of the immoral elements of the enemy in the face of the Islamic Revolution and the Resistance Front and the oppressed of the world, which is expressed with such elements as: "It is hopeful to magnify small and small flaws, to show or deny great virtues." The Islamic Revolution took place at a time when the "growing moral collapse of the West" was certain and "the development of sludges of corruption to eradicate morality and spirituality in major parts of the world" was the main axis of the arrogant Western front. For this reason, in the face of the Islamic Revolution in the first forty years, the West mainly uses the immoral elements of "deception and deceit and lies." The main purpose of this study is to explain the enemy's use of the element of deception for domination in the Islamic world. This was the focus of the Supreme Leader of the Revolution in the second step statement and they emphasized it during their leadership.With a descriptive-analytical method and focusing on the statement, we will take the second step and with a documentary approach and reference to the sources of explanatory libraries, the enemy will use this immoral element.

Since beginning of Islamic revolution of Iran tile now we saw the serious challenge of Islamic revolution toward authoritarian system of USA in internal, regional and international area. The recognition of real nature of Islamic revolution and devilish nature of authoritarian system, will remarkable help to understanding of challenge between those discourses. So, the main question in this research is; what is the basis and essence of divergence discourse of Ayatollah Khamenei toward authoritarian system? So, we answer this question by discourse theory and according to descriptive-analytic method. The findings of this research are; in Ayatollah Khamenei’s thought, anti-theocracy is the nodal point of Islamic revolution discourse and in basis of Islamic elements originated in Quran, narratives, Sireh of Imams and speech of Imam Khomeini, the discourse of authoritarian system of USA whit nodal point of liberal democracy is serious danger for humanity, honesty, society and world. So, he’s approach toward authoritarian system of USA is divergence.

Fighting against the system of domination and arrogance has been and is one of the lofty goals and ideals of the Islamic Revolution. And perhaps the most important enemy of this revolution is this system of domination. Familiarity with the nature of the system of domination and arrogance and its characteristics and how it works, especially from the perspective of the Supreme Leader of the Revolution, who is the flag bearer of the struggle against the system of domination, is one of the obvious necessities of the Islamic Revolution. Therefore, in the present article, the Supreme Leader's view on the system of domination has been examined, citing his statements and writings. From the Supreme Leader's point of view, the system of domination has features such as macro-politics; The enslavement of nations, the imposition of approaches on other nations, the advancement of hegemons, propaganda and exaggeration, the threat and intimidation of nations, the defense of Israel, relies on the world's major economic enterprises, hypocrisy and hypocrisy, and the tools of the world domination system from a leadership perspective. Cultural and propaganda, human rights, science and technology, international organization, economic instruments, military intervention and security tools. The Islamic Republic's stance against the system of domination in the view of the leadership is the discourse of the Islamic system, shouting and exposing against oppression and domination, non-acceptance of the domineering and destructive domination system, production of knowledge and strengthening of faith, preservation of anti-American slogans and constant struggle. From his point of view, the struggle against arrogance and the system of domination is not closed and is even one of the basic works and the foundations of the revolution.

always leads to humiliation and humiliation. Resistance and perseverance against the tyranny of the oppressors is a religious and Qur'anic matter. God has made it a duty to persevere in the face of coercion and to tell His servants not to succumb to injustice and to fight with all their might. Resistance literature is the expression of confrontation and confrontation between two ideas and thinking, one based on injustice and domination, and the other is the front that is trying to realize the right. The Qur'an considers it a religious duty to defend the oppressed and condemns the acceptance of oppression. God Almighty considers the dignity of Muslims, the authority of believers, the way out of passivity, and the defeat and isolation of dissenters as the result of resistance against the corrupt. . From the Qur'an's point of view, the main goal of resistance is to create balance and equilibrium in society. Religious insight demands collective resistance against the hegemonists and holds all members of society accountable to the oppressors. In this study, which has been compiled based on religious teachings and the words of religious leaders, after a brief look at the Qur'anic roots of resistance, the necessity, fruits and achievements, examples and results of sustainability have been discussed.

One of the planned actions of the enemies of the Islamic Revolution is the cultural influence that they have used in recent years against the Islamic Republic of Iran. Given the importance of this issue, from the perspective of the Supreme Leader, the present study, using a descriptive-analytical method, seeks to explain the nature of cultural influence and descriptive strategies to oppose it. According to the guidelines of the Supreme Leader, after explaining the nature of cultural influence, the author examines the dimensions of influence including three areas: economic, political and cultural, and after stating the methods and tools of cultural influence, examines its solutions in two pivots. In the first pivot, cultural strategies in the field of epistemology-cognition are stated, which include: accepting cultural influence, promoting religious beliefs and understanding Islamic culture, and in the second pivot, cultural strategies in the field of behavior including: cultural management, organizational activity and having the initiative in cultural affairs are examined.