جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه « falsification » در نشریات گروه « علوم قرآن و حدیث »

The problem of this research is to investigate the application of Popper's falsifiability to justify religious propositions and the possible success of this application. Popper's philosophy of science has attracted the attention of Christian theologians and theologians due to the fact that he considers metaphysics to be a rational matter, and they have used his opinions in the philosophy of science and epistemology to justify religious propositions or refute scientific opinions that were against religious teachings. . In this research, which was written with analytical-critical method, while examining the application of falsifiability theory in justifying theological propositions by various Christian theologians, objections to this application were presented in two basic and constructive areas. The findings of the research show that despite the capabilities of falsifiability for the rational justification of religious propositions, basic defects such as totalism, the lack of a specific criterion for knowledge, and structural defects such as the logic of skepticism that governs falsifiability and the impossibility of suspending religious knowledge until new knowledge is obtained, prevent falsifiability from being able to, defend the truth of religion and religious matters and will ultimately lead it to the abyss of relativism.

Among the Quranic verses which are cited to demonstrate the falsification (taḥrīf) of the Bible according to the Quran, there are two types of expressions; first, the verses speaking of “substitution” (tabdīl), plus the verse referring to “inscription of the Book” by Jews. Using the methods of Semantics and Pragmatics on the ground of intertextuality, this paper aims to analyze these verses. This survey shows that there is no meaningful relationship between “substitution” verses and Biblical falsification, because the former is solely related to an oral subject, and hence irrelevant to the written scriptures, such as the Bible. Nor “inscription” could be considered as referring to taḥrīf, because of grammatical obstacles. A close analysis shows that the “Book” mentioned in this verse is the Torah, rather than a spurious book forged by Jews, and the verse speaks of a Jewish belief regarding the inscription of Moses’ Tablets by the finger of God. Hence, it can be concluded that neither verse admits the idea of Biblical falsification.

Forgery of hadith is one of the obvious phenomena in Islamic traditions. Some fake narrations are characterized by identifying their narrators. The document of the narrations, which are made up of a chain of individuals, shows that the hadith is fake. Ibn Jawzi has referred to these people in the subjects and has considered the narrations related to such people as quoting a subject called trustworthiness. The present study has descriptive-analytical method while introducing two people who are famous for quoting the hadiths of a state of trust, and has studied their narrations. Suleiman ibn Arqam is accused of narrating from Aisha, Abu Hurayrah, Zohri, Hassan Basri. These people are not authenticated from the Shiite point of view. Muhammad ibn Yunus is also accused of quoting the subject from the trustworthiness that the document of his hadiths leads more to the infallibles. The environmental conditions and factors of the rijals are effective in calling the narrators liars. The narration of hadiths without examination has caused the weakness of Ibn Arqam and Muhammad ibn Yunus in their time, while they were not the authors of the hadith. Some of these hadiths, having a correct document, have been considered fake and subject due to some evidences such as the existence of "opposing hadith", "incompatibility with science", "dissimilarity to infallible words", "inconsistency with Shiite beliefs". Therefore, it was possible for Sunni narrations to be transmitted to the Shiites by forging a correct document.

Passing of time and problems in writings and copying of hadith's writings caused damages for documents of narrations. Transmitting, dropping and omitting of intermediary in the chain of documents are among them. This writing tries with emphasizing on documents of narrations of The Four Books, to discover, study and analyze recognizing methods of hidden transmission, reason and evidences of them in narrations of The Four Books. The basic question is what factors or evidences led to hidden transmission in documents of narrations? Which methods and approaches are there for dealing with the dilemma of transmission in documents of narrations? For achieving this goal, we analyzed methods like taxonomy and comparison of similar documents, Takhrij(process of tracking the hadiths in various collections) of documents and text of hadith in other narrative sources, difference in versions and other Ijtehadic evidences with samples of that in documents of The Four Books, and in second chapter, dealt with reasons and evidences of hidden transmission such as: falsification in document, alternation in name of the narrator or narrators in documents and similar names of some narrators in documents of The Four Books.

The idea of Biblical falsification is so widespread among Muslim scholars that it seems believable that once it had not been at existence at all. This paper aims to survey the history of the genesis and development of this idea in the Shi'ite and Sunnite exegeses by using the research method of "history of ideas". This survey shows that this idea has had two different stories in two traditions, but in both of them it has reached a common point simultaneously. The overall image of this path may be explained by the pattern of "silence-murmur-new paradigm", though the details -- including the history of genesis of each level, the reason of transmission from a level to the next, and even the number of levels -- differ in each tradition. This paper tries to compare these two different paths of historical development of the idea depict a detailed image of the story.

Sheikh Baha al-Din al-Amili's book al-Kamil contains certain scenes of Ashura. Its hardcore is the same as those included in other maqtals, yet it is rather dissimilar to others. The athor added somethings based on his own judgment, yet he quoted many things from here and there, without documenting them. The present paper with its author's attitudes and phrasing.

Many Quranic verses speak explicitly of confirmation (taṣdīq) of the Bible by the Quran. These verses are usually seen as in contrast to other verses implying Biblical falsification (taḥrīf). Some explanations have been suggested by Muslim scholars to resolve this contrast, most of which are facing with further reservations. The most recent response given by some scholars, who have tried to analyze the supposedly taḥrīf verses, is that nothing has said in the Quran regarding the falsification of the Bible. This paper aims to transfer the point of concentration from taḥrīf verses to taṣdīq verses. It will be shown, therefore, that the linguistic methods of pragmatics help us to find a way to the hidden layers of these verses and to find out the more accurate interpretation of them and actual position of the Quran regarding the Bible. The paper confirms the recent contributions that reject a Quranic tendency to the idea of Biblical falsification.

There have been several untrue statements about the tragic martyrdom of Ali al-Asghar in a variety of maqtal texts. They have appeared owing to baseless statements, texts written and speeches made by uneducated people, the desire to write and talk on the subject as much as possible, and focusing There have been several untrue statements about the tragic martyrdom of Ali al-Asghar in a variety of maqtal texts. They have appeared owing to baseless statements, texts written and speeches made by uneducated people, the desire to write and talk on the subject as much as possible, and focusing only on the tragic scenes, all of which that have led to several false and unreliable statements.

So far orientalists have researched a lot about the Holy Quran and have published very considerable works.But in this case, the essential point is that the purposeful selection of research topics in the Holy Quran. One of the most important issues of the orientalists in his Quranic researches have noted is history of Quran, which the following branches of the subject collection of the Quran, recitation, there are different dialects of the Arabs and the different readings of Quran.
This article will explain the historical background of the issue and introduced the works of orientalists about the variant readings of the Quran, and to explain the reasons of entering Orientalists in this special issue

There are many works written on the Qurʾānic studies in the West and its history. One cannot, however, find a comprehensive survey on the history of the Western scholarship of Shiʿi tafsīr.This contribution seeks to review all works done by the Western scholars of 19th and 20th century on the Shiʿi tafsīr or the Shiʿi attitude to the Qurʾān. Then it trties to present an analysis to answer the questions like how did this branch of the Western scholarship come into being, and which steps did it pass in the way of progress. It also will offer an answer to the problem of the Western scholars’ obsession with shiʿi concepts of taḥrīf and taʾwīl.

Penetration of falsification among the unique ideology of Islam especially by Jews is one of the harms to Islamic sciences in which is called Israelites (Falsification). Two sects’ expositors act differently in this regard. AllameTabatabaie as a pioneer except a few times avoids using these sources in his explanation. He used different methods to do so, like looking throw the sources and more than that, he had emphasis on the text itself based on Quran, Traditions, sinless characteristics of prophet and his family (pbut), exact date and Scientific proof to differ true Quotes from falsification. Although there were lots of falsification in prophets’ life history and its conflict with the sinless characters of them was one of the most important methods that he used in Almizan. In this study there is falsification analysis and acquaintance criteria and critics on them.