جستجوی مقالات مرتبط با کلیدواژه "تحلیل گفتمان" در نشریات گروه "علوم تربیتی"

Conflict is an inevitable part of every intimate relationship, especially the couples’ relationship. The narrative that couples present about conflict is reflection of their worldview and attitude towards problems and plays an important role in how they deal with conflict. An appropriate therapeutic intervention to marital conflicts also requires critical attention to the dominant discourses in the narrative of conflicted couples. Therefore, the present research was conducted with the aim of qualitative investigation of the dominant discourses in the narrative of conflicted couples. The data was collected by purposeful sampling and semi-structured interviews with 26 couples. After analyzing the data using thematic analysis method, other-centered, self-centered, and situation-centered discourses were identified as the dominant discourses. The results showed that among the communication components of self, situation and other, most of the discourses are directed to the other, self and situation respectively. In the sense that in conflicted couples’ definition of conflict, among the external factors, the individual and the relationship are more important than the situation. In other-centered discourses, language is used as a tool for demanding and complaining about the spouse as the main focus of conflicts, and in self-centered discourses, language is used as a tool to abdicate one's responsibility and express domination, self-praise, and power. In situation-centered discourses, the function of language is to complain about stressful changes. As a result, the dominant discourses of conflicted couples tends to present a negative and unfavorable image of the spouse and the situation, and to ignore their role in conflicts. In general, the narrative of conflicted couples is full of problem-oriented language instead of solution-oriented language, and instead of an interactive definition of conflict, couples tend to present their individual definitions and adopt an I-centered or you-centered approach to problems.

Ecological criticism examines the relationship between man and his environment; a relationship that has undergone transformations throughout history. One of the causes of such a transformation is the discourse of colonialism, which is prominent in the collection of stories "Gharibeha va Pesarak Bomi." In this research, we have analyzed the impact of colonial discourse on the environment in the collection of stories "Gharibeha va Pesarak Bomi" by Ahmed Mahmoud to take a small step toward raising awareness in dealing with the environment. Therefore, using a descriptive-analytical method with an interdisciplinary approach, and according to Foucault, in this collection of stories, instead of focusing on the sources of power, we have examined its consequences in order to investigate the destructive effects of colonial discourse on the natural and human environment. This vision is necessary for our human society, which has suffered from environmental crises, to become aware of the appropriate behavior toward the environment. The results of this research on the collection of stories "Gharibeha va Pesarak Bomi" indicate that the discourse of colonization has turned the environment into a subject subjugated to power and distanced it from its object. By moving nature away from its position as an object, it has caused pollution, which has led to problems for human life. In fact, man and the environment have been vehicles for exercising the power of colonial discourse, which is evident in categories such as air and water pollution, disturbance of ecological balance, lack of rainfall, cutting down of palm trees, soil erosion, separation of man from nature, loss of peace from people's lives, noise and visual pollution, poverty, unemployment, migration, creation of tension and conflicts between people, disregard for national and epic foundations, creation of class gaps, and reduced life expectancy. In short, society, economy, and ecology in this collection of stories, influenced by colonial discourse, have been ineffective measures for sustainable development because they have not moved in alignment with it; rather, they have been in opposition to it.

current research is to critically analyze the discourse of world peace in the textbooks of the Iranian educational system based on the theory of identification by L& M. For this purpose, the textbooks between the years 1357-1392 (primary period and first period high school) have been analyzed. This article has been done with the combined method of analyzing the discourse of Fairclough, L &M and focusing on the following questions: What was the status of the world peace discourse in the educational documents of this era? What subjects are these educational materials trying to create? What role have the dominant political discourses in this era played in shaping the identity of these subjects? The findings show that the discourse of world peace in educational books and documents has been rejected due to the demarcation between Islamic and non-Islamic, internal and external. Power processes have tried to create militant and vengeful subjects with a military identity. The factor of persuasion of the subjects is the axiomatization of the ideologies of the revolution with an Islamic nature. Also, the educational content by inducing specific defense ideologies has formed pacifist identities in all individual, interpersonal, social and international dimensions.

Cinema represents political, social and cultural realities. The discourse analysis of Laklau and Moufee also represents the realities of the linguistic text according to components such as ideology, society, culture and politics. The representation of disability in the media is important in the sense that the media plays an important role in creating and changing attitudes towards disability. The aim of the research is to show how the social elements of disability have been reinforced or reproduced in the movie "Mime Like Mother" and what meaning system has been formed around disability in the society.

The film "Mime Like Mother" was analyzed at two levels of text and performance with the conceptual and methodological tools of Lacla and Mouffe. Then the complete data of the film were described and analyzed using the discourse components proposed in their theory.

Three articulations (articulation of the character of the mother, the character of the father, and the character of the disabled person) and three discourse orders (rational, emotional, violent discourse) were achieved.

The research results showed that what has been represented in this film about disability is based on three existing discourses; while the emotional discourse is highlighted, the rationality of rejection and the violent discourse are marginalized.

The assassination of General Qassem Soleimani became an event for the convergence of political currents inside Iran, as well as the focus of Islamic currents in the Middle East on the issue of terrorism and fighting the hegemony of foreign countries in the region.The prominent features of military command, political tact and charismatic personality are important components that made him superior to other senior military commanders of Iran. For this reason, after his martyrdom and the publication of his will as a coherent writing containing political, religious, religious and social opinions and thoughts, this question arose for the researchers that in the absence and vacuum of research on Sardar Soleimani's thought, which is the novelty of the current research. highlights, what political discourse does his will represent as an authentic document to the survivors?This research is of an applied type that by adopting the questioning strategy, it has analyzed the qualitative method of analyzing the discourse of Norman Fairclough, focusing on the writing of Sardar Soleimani's will.In the findings of the research, the elements of entitlement, expediency, oppression, religious authority, Shiaism, faithism, unificationism, deificationism, responsibility, anti-corruptionism, fundamentalism, sociability, description and then these elements are analyzed and interpreted step by step. became.In the general conclusion, it was found that Sardar Soleimani's political discourse, as a sub-discourse, has the necessary capacity to support the theory of Ayatollah Khamenei's revolutionary system and represent the discourse of political Islam.

The purpose of this research is to investigate the discourses caused by the spread of domestic violence news in the context of virtual media (Instagram, Telegram and WhatsApp) in the community. The present research was conducted with the method of critical discourse analysis; The research sample consisted of 15 married men and women in Khorramabad city, who were selected in a targeted way from among the available people according to the criteria of willingness to participate in the research, daily use of virtual media (at least 2 hours a day), university education, and physical and mental health. They were elected in 1400.The interview was conducted in a semi-structured manner and based on the axes of Lacla and Mouffe's theory. The results show that the spread of domestic violence news in virtual media is the emergence of the dominant discourse of social insecurity and loss of values; It is arguable that the central sign formed around the axis of social instability and mistrust forms its structure with equivalent themes so that finally the identity of the audience present in the scene is drawn as an identity in crisis and under pressure that the discourses that govern him are antithetical and They oppose his fixed worldviews and values.Strategies such as media literacy, awareness of social issues, increasing individual and social differentiation, the strength of social and family ties, and acquiring a solid philosophy of existence and value can break the structure of the dominant discourse.As a result, it can be said that knowing the upcoming process and trying to build mutual discourses, in accordance with the intellectual, cultural and value context of the Iranian Islamic society, can prevent the spread of social harms, including domestic violence, and lead to the consolidation of individual and social values.

In today’s information society, science and technology are defined as the most important pillars of the development and progress of societies that are changing rapidly. Thus, governments try actively to enter the category of science and technology in their upstream policies and documents and make policies in order to make science a discourse at the level of society. The two basic concepts in the today’s science and technology discourse in our society, which require attention in documents and upstream programs, are ‘scientific authority’ and ‘eco-centric values’, which are also emphasized by the Supreme Leader. They can be seen in the upstream documents, including the comprehensive scientific map of the country. This study aims to analyze the discourse of the comprehensive scientific map of the country and present solutions to move towards the desirable situation in science and technology in the society.

This study was conducted using the discourse analysis method. The study population is all the contents of the comprehensive scientific map of the country, thirteen strategies of which were purposefully analyzed using Laclau and Mouffe’s method and by reading this scientific map and taking notes.

The findings showed that the central signifier of this discourse is ‘innovative scientific authority’ which has found its meaning structure through the signifiers such as ‘indigenous knowledge’ and ‘knowledge-based economy’. This stabilization is supported by the ‘culture-bound/eco-centric’ hegemony, and the myth-making grounds of this document are also has been provided through slogans such as ‘establishing a new Islamic civilization’, ‘increasing technological production to more than 50% of GDP’, and ‘scientific authority of the Persian language’.

The extracted principles are: scientific authority, eco-centric values, negation of dependence, professional competence, scientific networking, research-based education, empowerment, demand-driven research, modern Islamic civilization.

Children's fiction is one of the most effective forms of non-formal education in addition to formal education; Influenced by the existing ideology and discourses, some educational elements are in the center of attention. Mahmoud Hakimi, as one of the most prolific children writers in the social and political space of the years before the Islamic Revolution and in opposition to the discourse of the domination system, has written stories for children and appropriate religious education that was his concern and part of the intellectual community at that time. He has chosen for his stories. The present study uses the method of critical discourse analysis and purposefully tells the story of "Flying to the Planet of Freedom", which is a kind of religious story, with the aim of extracting some educational elements, including; It has analyzed and explained the educational goals, behavioral patterns and educational methods that are most considered in belief systems (ideologies). The results of this research in terms of discourse analysis is that Hakimi has Five common discourses of his time, namely; The leftist Marxist discourse has described and criticized Christianity, nationalism, secularism, and Shiite Islam. The Fifth discourse is the dominant discourse and belongs to the wise discourse, and the educational themes in this work are influenced by the same discourse and are formed in contrast to other discourses, and while marginalizing other discourses, it has superiorized its discourse.

The purpose of this study is analyzing the position of teacher education in the political discourses that have been formed after the Islamic Revolution of Iran. This research seeks to go beyond mere descriptions and achieving contextual analysis for teacher education in Iran after the Islamic Revolution considering the teacher’s education in discourse approach and through document investigation. Research findings showed that he pervasive discourse of the Islamic Revolution has had a profound effect on teacher education policies. The continuity of religion and politics is the main sign of this pervasive discourse that has caused the influence of divine beliefs and religious understanding on teacher identification in the documents and texts of teacher education policy. Political sub-discourses that formed after the Islamic Revolution also had impacts on teacher education policies. In the constructive discourse, with economic development as a priority, the teacher was represented as a government agent and in the reform discourse, the teacher was seen as an arm for political development. The turning point of teacher’s education policy in the government of the Islamic Republic of Iran is the approval of the Fundamental Reform Document of Education (FRDE). With the approval of this document, the teacher’s education subsystem has been considered as a fundamental element of the education system in a forward-looking and future-oriented perspective and in a strategic position.

Linguists compare different languages for different reasons. If we compare two or more languages for discovering the similarities and differences between them, we would do contrastive linguistics. Several contrastive rhetorical studies have been carried out on Asian languages, but a few studies have been conducted on the rhetorical contrasts between English and Persian languages. The objective of this research is to help the teachers to be aware of differences in writing styles of different languages. Several studies have shown that when the students learn the methods of the first language, they always transfer them to the second language. For example, the writings of EFL students, regardless of the courses passed in writing, have structural problems in comparison with native English students’ writings. This study examines the differences and similarities of the discourse features or rhetorical patterns of expository paragraphs written by 30 ESL students of Shiraz University. Theoretically, this research is based on Kaplan and Connor’s studies. Practically, it is based on Becker and Dehghanpisheh (1971). In addition, to investigate if these rhetorical structure contrasts among languages are reflected in the university EFL learners’ writing textbooks, the university textbook of Paragraph Development: A Guide for Students of English was reviewed. Results of the data analysis showed that the English writings of Persian students are significantly different from the writings written by native English speakers. Furthermore, Persian students of English used L1 rhetorical patterns in their English writings that make them produce deviant and unnatural sentences. One of the reasons for this problem might be attributed to the university second language writing textbooks, including the textbook (Paragraph Development: A guide for Students of English) reviewed in the current study that almost lack any specific section on the contrasts between the second and first language rhetorical organization.

"Discourse analysis" is a way to study the formation of meaning in linguistic units larger than "sentence", which in addition to language, also takes into account metalingual factors. The subject of this research is not the story itself, but the sub-discourses within the story, which are formed between the subjects (i.e. between the characters of the story). Unlike language-based analysis-discourses, the method of analysis of this research focuses on cognitive psychology as metalingual aspect of discourse. Because the theme of "marriage" creates cognitive challenges to judgment, decision-making, and problem-solving for the parties involved in the sub-discourses of Aunt Beetle, the "cognitive processes" approach has been adopted for analysis. The present study seeks to reveal, in the social situations within the story, the hidden relationship of the characters' words and actions with their cognitive processes. In this regard, in a descriptive analytical method, it answers the question: how does the sub-discourse that is formed, in a social situation between characters, represent the hidden cognitive processes behind that discourse? The result shows that discourses are representations of hidden cognitions, which are cognitions constructed by the imposed process of subjectivity. The use of discourse analysis as a way to represent cognitions is unprecedented.

In this paper, teacher education discourse has been analyzed in the Islamic Republic of Iran. Research assumes the governance discourses that have been articulated after the Islamic revolution, have defined teachers' semantic systems that have placed the political, economic, and social position of teachers in power structures. These semantic systems include a central signifier for teacher education discourse that other signs being articulated around it. The research questions are: what have been the central signs of teacher education in the governance discourse formed after the Islamic Revolution? And what were the backgrounds of teacher education discourses after the Islamic Revolution? This research is based on Laclau and Mouffe's discourse theory mode through document mining. According findings of the research, the central sign of teacher education in the governance discourses after the Islamic revolution of Iran are: Revolutionary teacher training, teacher training as a government agent, political development of teacher, fundamental reform in teacher education, teacher education as a theoretical and practical model according to the Islamic standard system. The wide discourse of the Islamic Revolution has had a lasting impact on the process of teacher education. Also after drafting the Fundamental Reform Document of Education (FRDE) and the Document of Teacher Education and the Provision of Human Resources in the Formal and Public Education Subsystem, teacher education has been viewed as a strategic position in the education system with a long-term and forward-looking approach.

Religious science and the production of Islamic humanities is one of the most important and at the same time the most controversial scientific and sometimes political issues in the country, in the years after the victory of the Islamic Revolution (especially in the last one or two decades) and different views were suggested in this field that one of the most important and serious of these views belongs to Mehdi Golshani. Using the method of Laclau and Mouffe discourse, the present study seeksto identify the discourse elements and articulate their views in the field of religious science production. According to the research, the best sign of this discourse, which is observing the possibility of producing religious science, is "being based upon religion (Islamic) worldview". "Divine orientation and application", "Desirability of religious science", "The impact of worldview in the field of arbitration", "Inclusion of all sciences in terms of scope", "Using other methods along with experience", "Unity of science and religion" and "Relying on a holistic and unified attitude" have also been identified and examined as sub-signs of their discourse, and finally the set of these signs has been detailed in a communication system.

This paper aims to make known Ayatollah Khamenei, s environmental thoughts. It answers this fundamental Question: What are the dominant discourse factors on Ayatollah Khamenei’s environmental ideas? By using of under consideration views in the field of environmental valuation. The method of this study is Laclau and, Mouffe discourse analysis. The findings of this paper show that Ayatollah Khamenei sees the issue of the environment from spiritual and political aspects. In the framework of this discourse by Ayatollah Khamenei in the field of environment tendency; religion element is as nodal point proving and it's people-oriented, the revolutionary mentality; and rationality as the other points and factors are articulated with religion. This providing changed to dominant meaning in society by public informing; making legal and observing methods, suitable pattern making, empower and making convergence in executive power, enjoying of scientific studies and enabling of environmental diplomacy. Because of the absence of divine looking in using of the environment in west discourse, is located in the discursive field and became the competitor of Ayatollah Khamenei,s view.

Three sub discourses about the social area of the community relating to the early Islam were formed: the VelaI discourse, Khilafah discourse and the Sultanate (Absolutism) Discourse which all of them have put Islamic clothes on and tried to get (obtain)
the group mentality of the society by closing the Islamic floating signifiers (Islamic virtues) to the central signifier of their discourses. Consequently, to achieve this importance, these three discourses define their floating signifiers according to their central signifiers. As the replacement encouraging good by discouraging bad in the society originates (resulted)from their definition (interpretation) of these two which turning good deeds (Al Maroof) to evil deeds (Al-Munkar ).Because the speech of the holy prophet has been Velāyat (Guardianship): Only Allah is your Vali and His Messenger (ÅöäøóãÇ æóáöíøõßõãõ Çááåõ æó ÑóÓõæáõå), This paper is going to answer this question what the VelaIat discourse has presented for the floating signifiers which were not accepted by others and made two discourses create: Khilafah discourse and the Sultanate (Absolutism) Discourse. For answering this question, it will discuss the argument (dispute) between the VelaI discourse of Imam Hussein (p.b.u.h) and Khilafah discourse of Yazid ibn AbiSufyan as a case study.

This study has investigated the amount of using the discourse-making approach in the school textbooks to communicate the theory of Guardianship of the Jurist (Wilayat al Faqih) as emphasized in the lectures of the supreme leader of the the Islamic Revolution, Ayatollah Khamenei regarding the necessity of discourse-making using domestic theoretical frameworks originated from Islamic teachings. The research method used is "Discourse analysis" which is a qualitative approach to content analysis. We find that the school books follow a news-like and historical approach in communicating the concept of Guardianship of the Jurist (Wilayat al Faqih) and the discourse-making approach has been neglected. Of the main evidence of news-like approach is organizing the content of the books based on the chronological order of the events, categorizing based on subject and logical order and ignoring the inherent relations between the concepts. In communicating the concept of Guardianship of the Jurist, shortcomings identified other than the direct statement, include neglecting the audience and their misgivings, shallowness, concentration on memorizing and ignoring the depth of the subject, and neglecting the spiritual and emotional dimensions of the audience. We suggest using the discourse-making approach in designing school books for religious education